English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Lieberals on Yahoo by posting lies about them on Yahoo Answers? What do you think?

2007-02-17 10:43:28 · 14 answers · asked by mefeelsgreat5 1 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

I think you're better off here.

From the things you've said, I'd expect another Haditha out of you.

We don't need anymore bad apples spoiling the bunch.

2007-02-17 10:47:22 · answer #1 · answered by Mrs. Bass 7 · 3 1

Considering the way you posted your question I don't think you would be better at either. Save the fighting for the ones who have the true courage to fight and defend. And regarding the ones who sit on their a**es and insult, How does that help the moral of our Soldiers.
I don't condone war at all, I wish it never existed in our world. But before we jump up and begin to protest, we need to take a hard look at all who will be effected by our actions.
Just take the time to think of the soldiers who watched their fellow troops die in action, only to hear news reports of the many anti-war protest that were staged on the same day they died. It makes you feel like your Country does not appreciate the sacrifices these fine Men & Women make.
A lot of our Soldiers don't agree with the war and why we are there, but they do agree with our humanitarian efforts regarding the Iraqi people.
Its a touchy subject, just do whatever you feel is right for EVERYONE involved.

2007-02-17 11:21:22 · answer #2 · answered by Gianna M 5 · 1 0

Will you be enlisting also?

What happen to Q&A and dialogue? The bulk of this stuff in USA Politics & Gov just seems to be about venting. What does it accomplish? No one seems any happier for it ... the postings never improve. No one is informing anyone. If anyone even had a valid point sandwiched in the criticism, it would get lost. What a disappointment.

I see Y!A is limiting thumbs up and thumbs down ... removing some of them after placement. I noticed because I check back to see additional answers on some questions today, hoping for some real input and that's when I saw the thumbs up and downs had been removed. It was kind of pleasant actually. It was like seeing a wall freshly painted after gangland graffetti has been removed.

2007-02-17 10:47:40 · answer #3 · answered by ... 7 · 1 1

Sarcastic chap aren't you?

Can you give any evidence that more Iraqis have been killed, by US forces, than were killed in 7/11.

Can you give evidence that more Iraqis are being killed now than at any time under Saddam's rule.

Which journalists and why are more likely to give an independent view, those of syndicated newspapers or independent ones.

To answer a question with a question supposes a range of opinions but I would like to see rational debate on evidence not words like "brave" or "insulting".

2007-02-17 11:03:23 · answer #4 · answered by salubrious 3 · 0 0

stable question. My wager, as a militia veteran, is that the extreme type of suicides the Justice branch below Rumsfeld tried to cover could be an illustration that a number of those squaddies suspected the actuality. The Marine that replaced into interviewed in Michael Moore's movie, "Fahrenheit 9/11" rebelled and refused to combat "human beings in poverty" who had by no potential attacked us. The predicament is all of us understand the Cheney/Bush tyranny is responsible of conflict crimes, yet will the country heal or ever unite if our very own Congress and Senate take steps in direction of investigations/indictments? I remember the split that befell after Watergate, and because an relatively youthful Hillary Clinton, as a regulation clerk, replaced into on the Democratic committee, she replaced into vilified years later whilst she replaced into our First woman, and later whilst she ran for President via the unconventional staggering-wing who concept attempting to cheat in an election replaced into ideal habit (the ends justified the potential). would not this is extra desirable for our u . s . if this unlawful conflict (and the crimes of the administration) be became over to a third social gathering (the UN) so our Senate, Congress, and new President can concentration on the themes of our financial gadget, our international image, our tries to realize common wellness care, our fee-reducing in branch budgets, etc? i think of the present appearances of Cheney are the two him attempting to place a protection in case the conflict Crimes Tribunal being set up on Spain tries to summon him, in the different case he's being paid as a lobbyist to stay away from the proposed cuts via Robert Gates, in Rumsfeld's previous pastime on the Justice branch, from dealing with---tremendously those affecting his company Halliburton (the no-bid contractor for the Pentagon in Iraq) and its subsidiary KBR, who did such shoddy artwork on the taxpayers' dime that squaddies have been finished in the showers...or maybe the two...or he's an egomaniac attempting to do a revisionist version of his political mess ups...

2016-10-02 07:43:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

your choice,but before u decide consider what u think about which group of people join the army.
I think there are more people who join the army coming from families that have a household income of $60k and less,then those that have an income of $60k and above.What does this tell u about the citizens of your country[for that matter any country].
Why do the rcher people not risks there lives for their country.How many of the 'patriotic'senators have their children join the army.Indeed how many of these senators have fought for their country.G.bush and clinton managed to avoid the draft.Why and how?

2007-02-17 11:03:21 · answer #6 · answered by bbarr12 3 · 0 0

The country needs real men and women who are willing to support and defend the Constitution of the United States from enemies foreign AND domestic. Do you think you fit that description? If you do, then please enlist. We NEED people ready to fight for this country. Unfortunately, we need it as much here as anywhere else.

I would have to echo the sentiment of enlist and still fighting here.

2007-02-17 11:02:04 · answer #7 · answered by Wookie 3 · 0 1

Go ahead, there are enough over here for the insult job, and we need to cut back on the fighting here and let our soldiers do the fighting over there. We need more over there. to back up and give those guys a break more often, cut down on the fatigue and burn out.

2007-02-17 10:54:13 · answer #8 · answered by Auburn 5 · 0 1

Cover Your bets. Get a job with Army Public Relations!

2007-02-17 10:55:29 · answer #9 · answered by Ashleigh 7 · 0 1

You're probably better off enlisting, because you sure aren't insulting anyone with your infantile comments.

A conservative can't insult a liberal because reality has a liberal bias, and you aren't in the same area code as reality.

2007-02-17 10:54:06 · answer #10 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers