Do you think it's going to really happen? I have a few friends over there so I wasn't sure whether or not to get my hopes up that they could be home so much sooner than planned. What do you think?
2007-02-17 10:35:14 · 11 answers · asked by LibraT 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I wish that would happen but unfortunately the truth of the matter is that Clinton is not President so it does not matter what she calls for right now. Her policy would have to be debated and voted on first...it would not be a vote on bringing the troops home either...it would be to defund the war. Alot of people will not do that because then the troops would not get what they needed in order to keep fighting. We are stuck in between a rock and a hard place and have no one to blame except for this idiotic administration!!
2007-02-17 10:42:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
That is laughable. Congress can't even get enough votes to support a nonbinding resolution against the Iraq Study Group's recommended troop surge: http://www.usip.org/isg/iraq_study_group_report/report/1206/iraq_study_group_report.pdf (TOP OF PAGE 50).
How in the world does she think she will be able to get enough votes to reverse the President's authorization for this war? This is nothing more than her trying to redirect criticism away from her initial vote in authorizing the war. She cares more of getting into the White House than she does for the troops in Iraq.
DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING SHE SAYS!!!
2007-02-17 18:45:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
90 days after she becomes president.. which wont happen in a MILLION years... so no.
shes the senator of NYC.. she has no power right now except a 1/250 vote in congress...
If we pulled all the troops out so quickly... not only would your friends be gearing back up within 1-2 months.. but so would you, your wife, and your 3 kids...
just after Iran, Syria, Al-Sadr's Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Russia, China, France, Lebanon, and Somalia declare war on Israel, England, and the USA...
why would you ever want to remove the only thing slowing down the terrorist regimes in the middle east's unlawful military exploitation+growth?
Maybe because Mrs. Clinton cant think that far ahead.
2007-02-17 18:44:11 · answer #3 · answered by Corey 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't get your hopes up. The Evil Empress isn't the CinC (and, God willing, will NEVER be).
She must have read some poll and decided that would be the most favorable thing to say....today. STay tuned for the next exciting edition of Hillary! She'll say anything she needs to say in order to get what she wants.
2007-02-17 18:45:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
just when i thought they couldnt get any dumber
TADA!!
its all show for votes, but it sickening at the LEAST..
as Nader put it..
"... she's really a panderer and a flatterer. As she goes around the country, you'll see more of that,"
Nader the psychic
2007-02-17 18:43:13 · answer #5 · answered by chumpchange 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The last I checked, Clinton is not the president. Don't hold your breathe.
2007-02-17 19:15:56 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Since when is Clinton our commander-in-chief?
2007-02-17 18:44:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I doubt it will happen but I support it
2007-02-17 19:25:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not a bad idea I'd say.
2007-02-17 18:42:09 · answer #9 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not really sure if thats true or not
2007-02-17 18:44:43 · answer #10 · answered by PROUD TO BE A LIBERAL TEEN! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋