“Giuliani is arrogant, bigoted, ill tempered and a womanizer. He divorced his 2nd wife, Donna Hanover, by announcing it at a press conference instead of telling her first. He was having an affair with an aide living at Gracie Mansion while still married and mayor of NY and he took credit for all the good things that were done by others in NYC. He fired William Bratton; the police commissioner in 1994 when he found out he made the cover of Time magazine because he (Giuliani) wanted to take the credit for the innovative crime fighting. I lived in NY during his dictatorship, and believe me; I would not want him as president. His character is far worse than Bush & Clinton's worse faults rolled into one, if you can believe that's possible. His name should be Mussoliani.
As for 9/11…. he’s no hero, he just happened to be in the right place at the right time. The real heroes of 9/11 were the NYC firefighters & police plus all the other forces from the surrounding tri-state areas who voluntarily came to pitch in & help us.”
2007-02-17 10:26:10 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
The above was posted by another member in asnwer to a similar question. After having dealt with the man on several occassions, I agree with her.
2007-02-17 10:28:05 · update #1
My dad, now deceased, was a NYC firefighter for more than 20 yrs.
2007-02-17 10:36:33 · update #2
Corey....but u did give a **** about Clinton's bJ....ah..the hypocrisy! It's OK for a con, but not for a democrat, eh?
2007-02-17 10:43:35 · update #3
OK, here'a a link from Newsweek:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17081159/site/newsweek/
2007-02-17 11:10:31 · update #4
I am a republican, but I have enough sense to vote for the person I feel is right for the job. Doesn't matter which party it is to me. You are right on the money on Rudy, I have read and known most everything you posted... in newspapers, etc.
You are absolutely right about 9/11. He did nothing heroic, it was the fire fighters and police and probally a few brave by standers that did the heroics.
God, almighty, we need someone to run like Judge Judy and voter's with some knowledge and common sense.
2007-02-17 16:19:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Rudy Giuliani would were an effective Mayor, yet that no longer regularly qualifies him to be the chief of the U. S.. making particular peoples garbage is picked up and cleansing graffiti off of homes are not any further tremendous feats compared to the household projects of the President. Rudy has precisely 0 adventure in federal politics. he will be a pawn for the neo-cons basically as Bush grow to be a pawn. the actual potential of the Republican get mutually does no longer unavoidably lie with the guy elected as President, as Cheney, Rove and Rumsfield proved. be careful the way you solid your vote. don't be fooled again.
2016-12-04 07:38:32 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't vote for him because he's a democrat in republican clothing,everything they want he wants it seems. Take away the right for Americans to protect their children in their own homes, Rudy's for it. Abort them babies at will,Rudy's for it. The gay marriage issue is a non starter for me,I never have understood why that one threatens people so much,must be a lot of right wingers out their not so sure about their sexuality. Besides the more gay men there are out there the more women out there for the rest of us.But your right Rudy is a putz.
AD
2007-02-17 12:26:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
HAHAHA I hope to god he run's, it will be awesome to watch him be destroted before our very eye's on television. This guy has no moral's i.e ending his marrige while his wife underwent cancer treatment's. Total douchebag and stand's no chance at all at winning the nod from his party let alone the white house.
2007-02-17 12:42:52 · answer #4 · answered by The Angry Dutchman 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well your information is enlightening,however Id already decided I wouldnt vote for him when I found out he was Roman Catholic. Thought that was a good enough reason for me.
2007-02-17 13:48:06 · answer #5 · answered by imback_missme 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The list could be any number of candidates, but I wont vote for him, because he is too liberal.
2007-02-17 11:17:28 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not in a million years. He's a staunch liberal.
2007-02-17 11:12:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't care for him.
But New Yorkers love him because he cut crime way down.
Did he nail you?
Democrats don't mind crime.
But, I would vote for him over a Democrat.
2007-02-17 10:31:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I wouldn't vote for him based on his looks I hate him just because he has an ugly face.
2007-02-17 10:32:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
you are quite desperate to get votes arent you...
too bad republicans worry about political issues...
not celeb paparazzi (90% fabricated) allogations...
we dont care about this fake bullsh*t...
we care about his "POLICIES" .. yea you know what those are? here: www.dictionary.com .. maybe that will help...
This isnt the miss universe competition.. we dont give a sh^t about how Giuliani divorced his wife... we dont give a sh^t about how Dick Cheney's lesbian daughter got pregnant...
IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH NATIONAL POLICY!!
i guess thats the reason i WILL be voting for mccain/giuliani...
because he doesnt judge his important decisions on paparrazzi magazine covers...
people like you shouldnt be allowed to vote.
2007-02-17 10:37:03 · answer #10 · answered by Corey 4 · 0⤊ 5⤋