Would one expensive good eyepiece for a telescope or a set of cheaper eyepieces be better?

Question

would one expensive eyepiece for a telescope or a set of cheaper eyepieces of varying sizes be better or more use to me.

Answer 1

Personally I would opt for the cheaper set of several. You really need at least two, one low power for finding things and viewing large dim objects, like the Orion Nebula, and one high power for planets and double stars. Even the cheap ones today are reasonably good, and the expensive ones can be ridiculously expensive.

Answer 2

I'd go with the cheaper ones of varying size, but I'm just an amateur astronomer. More experienced astronomers who devote a lot of time to it would probably go with a better telescope and a more expensive eyepiece.

Answer 3

Your answer will depend on the quality of the scope. Your expensive eyepiece might be wasted on a scope with inferior optics. Also, your range of targets will determine how many eyepieces you really need. Plantetary (e.g. brighter) views will support higher magnifications (shorter focal lengths, 6-12mm) while fainter nebula/galaxies will need lower power (longer focal lengths, 25-40+mm) for a brighter image.

You would probably be happy with two higher end eyepieces. Also, the major telescope manufacturers tend to offer eyepiece packages with the purchase of a scope. I took advantage of Meade's full Plossl 4000 series eyepiece set offer with carrying case when I bought my scope. Granted, they aren't Nagler quality, but they suffice for my viewing choices.

Certainly, do not settle for the cheap Huygens/Orthos that come with department store scopes. They will leave you literally in the dark.

Answer 4

Good question, quite a dilemma. I remember back about 45 years ago when I faced the same question after making my first telescope. I solved it by buying three cheaper lenses (Sorry it has been a while and I have forgotten the names) and a Barlow lens. It worked well for quite a while. Later I purchased a Passel ( Spelling? good quality lens). That made quite a difference. I never touched the R? lenses after that.
What should you do? Still a good question. If you can afford one good quality wide field lens in the neighborhood of 1 inch focal length with a Barlow for higher magnification that would make a good combination.

Answer 5

you are going to could let us know greater with reference to the scope you're utilising. Aperture has lots to do with it since announces lots with reference to the sunshine your scope gathers. Atlas Explorer -- 130mm reflector? Focal length: 900mm popular mirror diameter: 4.5" 5x24mm finder scope Eyepieces offered -a million.25" diameter: 20mm, 12.5mm and 4mm a million 2x barlow lens a million a million.5x erecting eyepiece Equatorial mount versatile drives wood tripod with accessory tray A reliable reflector type, this telescope advantageous components a 4.5" popular mirror for greater mild accumulating ability and an EQ1 equatorial mount to song products over the years. Its 5x24 finderscope with crosshairs can test the heavens at low ability to locate celestial products devoid of postpone is this it?? utilising the 12.5mm eyepiece, you're able to have the flexibility to work out the Equatorial Band(s) and the 4 Galilean Moons, Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto. upload the 2X Barlow and you view ought to get somewhat greater valuable with some sacrifice of assessment and/or factor. If I had to endanger a wager, then i'd suspect the "spider" ought to have been knocked out of alignment. greater data, please. possibly there is a few thing askew with the scope that's an uncomplicated restoration. in the past you think of of trashing the scope to procure, come across a close-by astronomy club and attend one in each of their "public viewing" nights. i'm advantageous the participants would be satisfied to share their stories with you and help you get the main use out of the scope you have, to boot as supply keen perception into regardless of the "next scope" you ought to prefer.

Answer 6

Generally, in optics, two lenses will get a better resolution than one.