English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In an attempt to grandstand for her upcoming " presidential " bid, Ms Clinton introduced a bill attempting to cap the level of troop involvement without congressional approval prior to Bush deployment. In effect what this does, is make her, as well as the pelosi/reid regime commander in cheif NOT the president as the president would now have to have congressional approval for troop deployment. As the constitution clearly designates the president and not a presidential candidate, commander in chief, are we going to allow Ms. Clinton the attempt to rewrite constiutional governmental structure or is this, as well as the health care fiasco, the cattle futures fiasco, whitewater, travelgate, filegate, campaign finance gate 2000, the Montana Land grab and the other ...adventures...Ms. Clinton had, headed to be shot down in flames?

ps. for all you liberal extremists that cant believe she would do that...heres the link.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070217/ts_nm/iraq_usa_clinton_dc

2007-02-17 10:13:30 · 5 answers · asked by koalatcomics 7 in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

no way.

2007-02-17 15:35:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know about the Montana Land grab, but we all know the IRAQ Land Grab isn't working, it's just killing American Boys and Girls, In addition to thousands of Iraqi citizens.
I understand that daddy taught you that women are stupid, but again YOUR BOTH WRONG
Mommy keeps you hiding under her skirt so you won't wind up in IRAQ:(

2007-02-17 11:31:57 · answer #2 · answered by Nort 6 · 1 1

You've allowed the bush & the dick to throw the constitution in a trash container & pee on it, what could get worse that that?
And, if you're so pro-Iraq-involvement, sissy, why are you here? You castrated sickos who whine here all day have ZERO credibility, you babble but have no balls to act upon your beliefs, so go hide under you bed and squeal quitely there.

2007-02-17 10:34:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

think bro
she wants the job
why restrict the power of a few by neo lobby to bring on arnygeddon?
isnt it enough to have the codes and the button
they need the power to have war too
its about time
war is over if we get angry about our kids dying
or perhaps she should just stay quiet ,?
and let any president do what ever theyu will?
you trust her?
what if she wins
then you will be glad ,she disempowered her self?

2007-02-17 10:43:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I say, sure, she should go for it if it will get us the heck out of Iraq.

2007-02-17 10:17:00 · answer #5 · answered by Not so looney afterall 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers