Please, please, PLEASE will someone explain to me why does it seem that the 3 stooges are in charge when it comes to simply determining the following when it comes to this Anna Nicole Smith saga:
1) How she died?
2) who's damn kid it is?
3) Where to bury the body?
I get that her will directed everything to her son (who is also dead) but did the will not dictate what happens beyond him? How about getting your money back from the rocket scientist of a attorney for writting that one! I was under the impression you hire counsel to protect you from the future....
2007-02-17 10:09:51 · 6 answers · asked by Jim C 1 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
1) Some tests (toxic screens, etc.) do take days for results because of the way labs work and the double checking, more tests, etc. that are part of that process particularly for a coroner under a serious microscope with a case with such heavy media coverage. They probably already "know" but are confirming/eliminating everything else before releasing anything for public consumption.
2) It clearly isn't Howard K's because why fight a DNA test otherwise. Again, it is the fighting in courts, injunctions, etc. that have delayed even administering the test let alone the time for it to come back. BUT, eventually this baby will be tested and the truth will come out. I don't think the delays will last much longer.
3) I know she was estranged from members of her family but unfortunately that is who should get her body (her mom) given she has no other family AND assuming her will did not give that right over to someone else.
The moral of the story is keep your will up to date as your life changes particularly if you have strong opinions about things such as family members, etc. I die tomorrow, I have no issues. My husband gets everything (ain't much) and he will take care of funeral arrangements. If I was divorced, my parents would step in. If they pre-deceased me, my siblings would step in. None of who which would be an issue. . .
2007-02-17 11:01:51 · answer #1 · answered by Holly O 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps the mystery and confusion of the will lie in the atorney that wrote it --Howard K. I watched some of the court proceedings and I agree I(as ignorant as I am) could have made better decisions. The thing I keep thinking of is will the litle baby--who was not provided for--have anything left after attorney's fee from TX. CA., Fl, and the Bahamas? If the will was written 6 yrs earlier then someone (her attorney that drew it up) had a pre-pre-meditated reason to cut out any children that were to come. it is an amazing legal and social dilemma.
2007-02-17 18:24:43 · answer #2 · answered by luminous 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess some people never learn! The poor baby will probably never know who her real father is, and as far as Anna's burial that's going to court too! According to the "EXECXUTOR of her will... Mr.Brainiac... Everything goes to him and the baby! Who the hell says that? This will be a never ending saga!!
2007-02-17 18:19:19 · answer #3 · answered by ♥xvioletx1882♥ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First, I am not so sure she has any money left. The big lawsuit is still pending and her side may well get nothing.
Second: If it winds up that there is money, the lawyers get paid and the rest will go to the baby. I feel the judge will overide the previous will.
2007-02-17 19:13:18 · answer #4 · answered by Nort 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's MY damn kid. No, really.
2007-02-21 12:11:53 · answer #5 · answered by choose happiness 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We all want to know those things.
Time will tell.
2007-02-17 18:25:43 · answer #6 · answered by Lady D. J. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋