Yes when Clinton was president we had peace, prosperity and the respect of the world. He is still loved wherever he goes abroad unlike Bush who is mocked and looked at as an idiot and warmonger.
2007-02-17 09:57:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Raven 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well you are an idiot not to realize that the incumbent will not be on the ballot in 08.
I think the Republicans will win. If the Dems nominate someone other than the men and one women who are in the top five right now in the polls I will get worried.
08 is going to be a freebie for the Republicans particularly with the Dems in Congress. People like split Government.
And the top five are all very unserious candidates.
2007-02-17 17:53:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by John16 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am not sure to which idiot you are referring, and I am not sure to which Clinton your are referring either. Bill Clinton used to run when he was in the White House, but I have no knowledge that either Hillarious or Chelsey did any kind of exercise. Perhaps you should rephrase your question to include the type of running; sprints, marathons, jogging?
2007-02-17 17:52:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wiz 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
It seems you don't know or care about history. Clinton won his first election with only 43%...that's forty-three per cent of the vote. Ross Perot was in that race.
In Mr. Bush's re-election, he got 54% of the vote, or about 55 million votes. Clinton's measly 43% got him about 40 million votes.
If Mr. Bush was so bad, can you explain the re-election and almost 5 million more votes than Kerry? No. I did not think so.
2007-02-17 17:54:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
clinton is better at running yes under the table=desk at the Oval office yes to do what the whole world knows what he likes young gals do to him yes....But running the country the idiot that you mention is on your mind but doesn't exist is all in your mind...What we have now is a undivided nation yes...Because
2007-02-17 17:54:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by nena_en_austin 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Clinton is also a great family man
2007-02-17 17:53:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by rallman@sbcglobal.net 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Idiot isn't the word. Idiot, A foolish or stupid person. He doesn't even have the qualifications to be an idiot!
2007-02-17 17:52:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by St♥rmy Skye 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Idiot? What college did you graduate from. DUMBO U? What companies have you owned. What offices have you been elected to. Anyway, better at running what?
2007-02-17 18:12:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jim R 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes . . . running terrorists out of business, instead of creating them.
Company that he owned? Ohhh....you mean the company that Bush sold all of his stock in right before it went bankrupt. That's how he got most of his money, don't you know.
2007-02-17 17:57:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by kungfufighting66 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, he did *such* a bang-up job handling Iraq when Saddam violated the Gulf War treaty several times, violated the no-fly zones regularly, and thumbed his nose at the UN.
Oh wait...no, he didn't!
But thanks for playing. Have a nice day.
2007-02-17 17:54:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jadis 6
·
0⤊
1⤋