On the surface it sounds good. But he would not have the political connections. Like it or not, that is fact. He would not have any experience. That helps too. Even if you do not like it the President really does very little to run the governement. He is just a senior member of an adhoc committee.
But of course if he was President, people on here would say that Steve Jobs would be better, or Mark Cuban would do a better job.
2007-02-17 10:10:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jim R 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Considering that the government had to literally force him from his own company because he was intent on dominating the computer software companies means to me that he would probably try somehting similar if he ever ran for Presdent, dominating the country into his own style. Since he hasn't any real experience in politics, I think that could lead to a lot of problems for not just America but every country in the world, so I far from agree on what you say.
2007-02-17 12:10:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lief Tanner 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am afraid that your notions of providence are hindered by the inexorable fact that there is science in the world. There is such a thing as choice, and freedom is more important than faith. The thing that escapes your rehashed attempt at analogy is this: Marx said religion was opium to the people. He never said anything about <>. Sartre, Camus and the rest of the Existentialist argue that man invented God to explain the implacability of the universe. Your analogy breaks down in ways like a wounded chimera: both real and imagined. You assume things in existence which have no basis in fact. It only requires that we obey and not think leaving the most plausible answer an apocryphal enigma without preference or analog. It seems that the only thing you want to attempt to discuss is the religion of Islam. And you do not seem to have the courage, understanding, nor the mind to do even that. And whether one agrees or disagrees is nonplussed in the face of this drivel you play as <> in query.
2016-05-23 23:37:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I completely disagree
his company has not been innovative, just monopolizing
his products don't work well, they crash all the time
greed does not make good
people think he is charitable
nonsense, he gives a tiny portion of his income and seems charitable, he has more than anyone else in the world, that's greed not charity
2007-02-17 09:36:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by anonacoup 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't think so.
People who are overly addicted to business have already done too much damage to this country.
Not everything should be run the way you would run a business.
2007-02-17 09:46:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by catrionn 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
$400,00 a yr. doesn't pay hour for him. He wouldn't mess with pennies for a salary or listening to a bunch of nuts .
2007-02-17 09:36:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
100% He should be President. You can get more information about him at http://www.billgatesmicrosoft.com
2007-02-17 17:52:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by rock s 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
My boss would be better. He'd fire just about everybody and have the rest of the world scared of him.
2007-02-17 09:38:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by popeyethesadist 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Never thought of that but it is a good idea.
2007-02-17 09:36:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cinna 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he would do pretty good, he's very charitable which is a good sign.
2007-02-17 09:35:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Racin Girl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋