English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what fascism actually means?

People tend to throw this word around alot without knowing the true meaning of it. They use it as a "put down" to descirbe Right wing or conservative, or Extreme left wing political movements. So please do a google search for "define fascism" and see what you can find and answer my question as to what Fascism means. 10 points to whomever gives me the most complete answer

2007-02-17 08:40:10 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Since so many said Mussolini founded fascism ,lets use his defination.....

In 1932 Mussolini wrote (with the help of Giovanni Gentile) an entry for the Italian Encyclopedia on the definition of fascism.
...The Fascist accepts life and loves it, knowing nothing of and despising suicide: he rather conceives of life as duty and struggle and conquest, but above all for others -- those who are at hand and those who are far distant, contemporaries, and those who will come after...
...Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…Marxian Socialism, the materialist conception of history of human civilization can be explained simply through the conflict of interests among the various social groups and by the change and development in the means and instruments of production.... Fascism, now and always, believes in holiness and in heroism; that is to say, in actions influenced by no economic motive, direct or indirect. And if the economic conception of history be denied, according to which theory men are no more than puppets, carried to and fro by the waves of chance, while the real directing forces are quite out of their control, it follows that the existence of an unchangeable and unchanging class-war is also denied - the natural progeny of the economic conception of history. And above all Fascism denies that class-war can be the preponderant force in the transformation of society.
...Fascism denies, in democracy, the absur[d] conventional untruth of political equality dressed out in the garb of collective irresponsibility, and the myth of "happiness" and indefinite progress....
...For Fascism, the growth of empire, that is to say the expansion of the nation, is an essential manifestation of vitality, and its opposite a sign of decadence. Peoples which are rising, or rising again after a period of decadence, are always imperialist; and renunciation is a sign of decay and of death. Fascism is the doctrine best adapted to represent the tendencies and the aspirations of a people, like the people of Italy, who are rising again after many centuries of abasement and foreign servitude. But empire demands discipline, the coordination of all forces and a deeply felt sense of duty and sacrifice: this fact explains many aspects of the practical working of the regime, the character of many forces in the State, and the necessarily severe measures which must be taken against those who would oppose this spontaneous and inevitable movement of Italy in the twentieth century, and would oppose it by recalling the outworn ideology of the nineteenth century - repudiated wheresoever there has been the courage to undertake great experiments of social and political transformation; for never before has the nation stood more in need of authority, of direction and order. If every age has its own characteristic doctrine, there are a thousand signs which point to Fascism as the characteristic doctrine of our time. For if a doctrine must be a living thing, this is proved by the fact that Fascism has created a living faith; and that this faith is very powerful in the minds of men is demonstrated by those who have suffered and died for it.

2007-02-17 09:21:59 · answer #1 · answered by Akkita 6 · 0 0

Fascism - definition
A totalitarian philosophy of government that glorifies the state and nation and assigns to the state control over every aspect of national life. The name was first used by the party started by Benito Mussolini , who ruled Italy from 1922 until the Italian defeat in World War II. However, it has also been applied to similar ideologies in other countries, e.g., to National Socialism in Germany and to the regime of Francisco Franco in Spain.

2007-02-17 08:45:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

People do tend to throw that one around a lot don't they?

Fascist is way down the line on the conservative side, which runs conservative, authoritarian, fascist, dictatorship.

The liberal side runs liberal, socialist, communist, communist dictator.

Essentially on the conservative side, the state owns the people, on the liberal side, the people own the state.

When they hit dictator, they sort of split the ground between them, which is why fascist is incorrectly used to label extreme liberal (Communist) behavior.

BTW - I am not saying liberals are communists, any more than I am saying Conservatives are Fascists, it is just the extreme form of the particular camp.

In the "shouting down college student" scenario someone mentioned, that is communist behavior. People trying to own the state. If the school hired a gang of thugs to beat the crap out of the students, THAT would be fascist behavior, the state owning the people.

The classic case of this was early unions (particularly miners) against Company hired private police who tried to break the strike through use of brute force.

-Dio

2007-02-17 08:54:15 · answer #3 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 1 0

This is funny. In reality there is no definition of fascism. It originally referred to Mussolini's government in Italy, period.
Through the decades since the end of WWII, a number of eggheads have defined the word differently. All of these eggheads use a word that people associate with hatred and surround it with a meaning to trash whatever ideology they oppose.
The current definition used today was written in 1995 by a communist who wanted to forged a definition for the word that would fit capitalism and the USA in particular.
Any definition you come up with other than Mussolini's government is BS. Sorry.

2007-02-17 09:13:01 · answer #4 · answered by .... . .-.. .-.. --- 4 · 1 1

Fascism a. A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. b. A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.

It certainly has some aspects of the Bush Administration.
And the Neo-Cons.

2007-02-17 08:47:53 · answer #5 · answered by itsdabigbadwolf 3 · 2 1

First thing you should know about FASCISM:

The first fascist state was that of Mussolini, in Italy prior to WWII. Francisco Franco of Spain also formed a government based on FASCISM.

Both of these and the Nazi party had one overwhelming credo: HATRED OF SOCIALISM AND COMMUNISM. By Hatred, I mean their idea of how to deal with socialism and communism is to murder anyone who did not subscribe to Fascist or Nazi form of government.

Fascism is ALWAYS: Conservative and Right Wing.

You can google it, but one of the best books I read to learn about it in depth was "Witness to a Century" by George Seldes. It is by far the most informative book I have ever read in my entire life. I highly recommend it to anyone who finds the FASCISM question confusing.

Thank you and good luck with your GOOGLE!

2007-02-17 08:46:40 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 0 1

The term fascism is first used by Mussolinni.I'll just give you directly what he said and how he defined it.
Benito Mussolini (1883-1945) over the course of his lifetime went from Socialism - he was editor of Avanti, a socialist newspaper - to the leadership of a new political movement called "fascism" [after "fasces", the symbol of bound sticks used a totem of power in ancient Rome].

Mussolini came to power after the "March on Rome" in 1922, and was appointed Prime Minister by King Victor Emmanuel.

In 1932 Mussolini wrote (with the help of Giovanni Gentile) and entry for the Italian Encyclopedia on the definition of fascism.


Fascism, the more it considers and observes the future and the development of humanity quite apart from political considerations of the moment, believes neither in the possibility nor the utility of perpetual peace. It thus repudiates the doctrine of Pacifism -- born of a renunciation of the struggle and an act of cowardice in the face of sacrifice. War alone brings up to its highest tension all human energy and puts the stamp of nobility upon the peoples who have courage to meet it. All other trials are substitutes, which never really put men into the position where they have to make the great decision -- the alternative of life or death....

...The Fascist accepts life and loves it, knowing nothing of and despising suicide: he rather conceives of life as duty and struggle and conquest, but above all for others -- those who are at hand and those who are far distant, contemporaries, and those who will come after...

...Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…Marxian Socialism, the materialist conception of history of human civilization can be explained simply through the conflict of interests among the various social groups and by the change and development in the means and instruments of production.... Fascism, now and always, believes in holiness and in heroism; that is to say, in actions influenced by no economic motive, direct or indirect. And if the economic conception of history be denied, according to which theory men are no more than puppets, carried to and fro by the waves of chance, while the real directing forces are quite out of their control, it follows that the existence of an unchangeable and unchanging class-war is also denied - the natural progeny of the economic conception of history. And above all Fascism denies that class-war can be the preponderant force in the transformation of society....

After Socialism, Fascism combats the whole complex system of democratic ideology, and repudiates it, whether in its theoretical premises or in its practical application. Fascism denies that the majority, by the simple fact that it is a majority, can direct human society; it denies that numbers alone can govern by means of a periodical consultation, and it affirms the immutable, beneficial, and fruitful inequality of mankind, which can never be permanently leveled through the mere operation of a mechanical process such as universal suffrage....

...Fascism denies, in democracy, the absur[d] conventional untruth of political equality dressed out in the garb of collective irresponsibility, and the myth of "happiness" and indefinite progress....

...iven that the nineteenth century was the century of Socialism, of Liberalism, and of Democracy, it does not necessarily follow that the twentieth century must also be a century of Socialism, Liberalism and Democracy: political doctrines pass, but humanity remains, and it may rather be expected that this will be a century of authority...a century of Fascism. For if the nineteenth century was a century of individualism it may be expected that this will be the century of collectivism and hence the century of the State....

The foundation of Fascism is the conception of the State, its character, its duty, and its aim. Fascism conceives of the State as an absolute, in comparison with which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State. The conception of the Liberal State is not that of a directing force, guiding the play and development, both material and spiritual, of a collective body, but merely a force limited to the function of recording results: on the other hand, the Fascist State is itself conscious and has itself a will and a personality -- thus it may be called the "ethic" State....

...The Fascist State organizes the nation, but leaves a sufficient margin of liberty to the individual; the latter is deprived of all useless and possibly harmful freedom, but retains what is essential; the deciding power in this question cannot be the individual, but the State alone....

...For Fascism, the growth of empire, that is to say the expansion of the nation, is an essential manifestation of vitality, and its opposite a sign of decadence. Peoples which are rising, or rising again after a period of decadence, are always imperialist; and renunciation is a sign of decay and of death. Fascism is the doctrine best adapted to represent the tendencies and the aspirations of a people, like the people of Italy, who are rising again after many centuries of abasement and foreign servitude. But empire demands discipline, the coordination of all forces and a deeply felt sense of duty and sacrifice: this fact explains many aspects of the practical working of the regime, the character of many forces in the State, and the necessarily severe measures which must be taken against those who would oppose this spontaneous and inevitable movement of Italy in the twentieth century, and would oppose it by recalling the outworn ideology of the nineteenth century - repudiated wheresoever there has been the courage to undertake great experiments of social and political transformation; for never before has the nation stood more in need of authority, of direction and order. If every age has its own characteristic doctrine, there are a thousand signs which point to Fascism as the characteristic doctrine of our time. For if a doctrine must be a living thing, this is proved by the fact that Fascism has created a living faith; and that this faith is very powerful in the minds of men is demonstrated by those who have suffered and died for it.

2007-02-17 09:17:28 · answer #7 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 1 0

One of my friends in my Genetics class raps a little bit, and I knew a dude last year who also rapped a little and he's the only person I've ever met in real life who listens to Blackalicious.

2016-05-23 23:30:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oppressive, dictatorial control. Libs throw this word around too much and have no idea of the meaning.


http://www.conservativeworld.us/

2007-02-17 08:44:36 · answer #9 · answered by JASON A 1 · 0 1

dictatorial government,repression..of all opposition,and extreme nationalism..example German national socialist party,,,,,,now what exactly are you seeking between the lines sir...hail bush,,,decider

2007-02-17 08:53:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers