so a 22" widescreen that is 1680x1050 VS a 20" 1600x1200......if i simply multiply the numbers, i get 1764 VS 1920 ....is this correct way to determine the actual 'real estate'...by this method it's telling me that there is more total screen on a 20" regular monitor than a 22" widescreen.
2007-02-17
07:43:17
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Sizzle Pizzle
3
in
Computers & Internet
➔ Hardware
➔ Monitors
well, i guess i can just multiply the actual inches they give on spec pages, minus bezel width....it's pretty obvious why they don't include actual screen sq. inches in specs, otherwise people would realize wide-screens arn't actually that much bigger.
2007-02-17
08:24:21 ·
update #1
ex.: Samsung 204b VS 225BW, including bezel, HxWdimensions are 294" VS. 320", so you only gain 26", not a lot %-wise! but pitch-wise the 20" is much better: .255 VS. .282 . seems like most 22" screens are all .28 pitch unless you spend a LOT more.
2007-02-17
08:32:13 ·
update #2