"I want to take those profits. And I want to put them into a strategic energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy, alternatives and technologies that will actually begin to move us in the direction of independence."
While I agree with energy independence, Isn't that socialism?
I hope you don't have a 401k with energy stocks.
2007-02-17 07:25:29 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
profits must be equitably adjusted
OK socialist.
2007-02-18 01:25:17 · update #1
No, I don't. And, yes I do. She will shred paperwork so we won't be able to prove either. I think we should ban her from using or owning paper shredders.
2007-02-17 07:29:42 · answer #1 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Energy independence is a must for this country. Big oil has the power to bring us to our knees any time it wants. Hillary knows she could not "take all those profits" and they know it. She may be giving them a heads up that profits must be equitably adjusted. To protect your 401k I would consider Schwinn Bicycle Company.
2007-02-17 21:30:56 · answer #2 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is why Hillary will never be elected. Her socialist agenda is exposed more every day. Barack Obama will expose her for what she is... A hippie from the 60's come back to try and turn America into a socialist country. Not gonna happen.
2007-02-17 15:31:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋