English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

NO excuse like it's not conventional warfare. Only text books have conventional war.

Look at the attacks the Taliban is making on China and Turkminastan they are growing.

2007-02-17 07:14:51 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

Because he didn't do the job right and made a bad decision to go to war with Iraq first . Wrong !!!!

2007-02-17 07:19:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Some people debate as to whether al-qaeda is even a functioning organization. They are so thinly spread, some say that if you cut off the head, the whole snake dies.

2007-02-17 07:18:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

because terrorists are exactly what the word implies.
they are not an army, they don't fight conventional ground wars, they strike from the shadows attacking with covert actions.
if you try to fight them where they aren't going to be, its kind of hard to win anything.
I mean i guess we can continue to drop bombs on any place that terrorists could possibly be, but that gonna end up depeleting the planet of civilians.

2007-02-17 07:20:18 · answer #3 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 0 0

NOPE! actual, you are able to element your finger at bill Clinton. back while he replaced into president, he replaced into exceeded Bin weighted down on a silver platter, purely bill replaced into too busy taking part in golfing to stop and sign the order. needless to say, Bin weighted down have been given away and hid in the hills of Afghanistan. That replaced into our ONE and purely threat at a sparkling shot on Bin weighted down. As bill left workplace, he whispered into George's ear that Bin weighted down replaced right into a risk. Now provided that 911 Bush has spent a fortune bribing informants to seize Bin weighted down. despite if Bush has controlled to take out a number of Bin weighted down's suitable hand adult males, we've under no circumstances gotten Bin weighted down himself. there replaced into another time that we very almost had him, however the operation had to be aborted on the final minute, by using fact of inadequate adult males. whats up! it quite is not precisely like a map quest journey going after Bin weighted down. the guy is consistently moving from one cave to a diverse to stay away from seize. it could be like attempting to locate a needle in a haystack that replaced into being tossed around. to that end, we are searching for one guy in the mountains of Afghanistan, variety of impossible. So, my chum, it quite is not Bush it quite is a failure, yet particularly Clinton, who did not grab the 2d, while he replaced into the president. all of us understand what Bush could do and all of us understand what Clinton did not do. My question to you is what could Obama do with Bin weighted down, if he had the possibility? not lots!

2016-12-17 12:23:55 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Bin Laden is out of power


The tabliban is WEAKER than ever.

2007-02-17 07:18:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Simple. Shear numbers. They put children into battle!

2007-02-17 07:20:21 · answer #6 · answered by Starla_C 7 · 0 1

because bush is tragically weak on terror.

2007-02-17 07:17:17 · answer #7 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers