English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-17 06:52:21 · 10 answers · asked by Nothing 2 in Sports Basketball

10 answers

only in time could you give a fair comparason, MJ had arguably the biggest career in basketball that one player could have...that would be mighty big shoes for LBJ to fill...because for one, he will never get 6 rings...or lead his team to 11 rings in 13 years (Russell)

2007-02-17 06:56:23 · answer #1 · answered by doingitright44 6 · 0 0

Lebron will never be better than MJ. I say this because Mj has 6 rings. LBJ will not see 2, probably not 1. Its like asking if someone is better than Jimi Hendrix at the guitar. Yeah they my be able to play Purple Haze, but really, Hendrix INVENTED IT. There is a reason why people compare themselves to MJ.

2007-02-18 06:17:04 · answer #2 · answered by phish_1125 2 · 0 0

Different Michael Jordan is the best to ever play the games the the records speak for themselves. LeBron should be greatful just to have his mane in the same sentence as MJ. Nuff said!!

2007-02-17 14:56:27 · answer #3 · answered by Lone_X_Ray 2 · 0 0

Michael Jordan will always be considered by many as the greatest basketball player who ever played.Nobody could take that away from him.We are all witness(at least those born at the time)of his greatness in the basketball court.Lebron is great too, but he can never be a Jordan.He will make a name for himself but no--he's not the next Jordan.

2007-02-17 15:21:06 · answer #4 · answered by hypermusic 3 · 0 0

LJ is not the next MJ. BEcause no body is better that MJ and nobody can take MJ place in NBA.

2007-02-17 14:56:16 · answer #5 · answered by manthan1991 2 · 0 0

Although this is Lebron's 4th year in the league I think it's still too early to tell. Remember Jordan wasn't Jordan until his 6th year in the league and he didn't win a championship until his 7th year.

2007-02-17 14:57:11 · answer #6 · answered by roni26 4 · 0 0

lbj is not the next mj. he cant shoot free throws. he is not as good a score. not as good a defender. and not as good a teamate.

2007-02-17 15:19:22 · answer #7 · answered by James 4 · 0 0

i think hes only [was] averging 30 6 and 6 because he knew he would get a lot of attention so hes trying as hard as he can to get that average... so hes worst

2007-02-21 14:37:57 · answer #8 · answered by ARNIE! 1 · 0 0

dude the only personthat is gonna be better than mj is me

2007-02-17 15:21:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

nah, he's good and has potential, but its too early to tell.

2007-02-17 15:13:06 · answer #10 · answered by lethebikesin 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers