Why are feminists such shrews?

Question

And what do they have against being feminine? Why do they perpetuate the lie that gender is a social construct?

Answer 1

Wow, lots of generalizing here. Do you know all feminists in the world? If not how can you stereotype them as shrews? This is the type of thought pattern that causes such power imbalances and pain in the world. These are the core values of racism, and the intolerance that leads to injustice and inequality which is really what feminism is attempting to equalize.
Feminists also have long hair, and wear dresses, high heels, purses and earrings. They shave under their armpits and legs as well. Many like myself are heterosexual. You are doing women a great disservice by spreading these preconceived misconceptions of what feminism really is. I would say that most of what all women do that is considered feminine has been taught to them by society, their peers, media etc. Alexandra you really are just a follower even though you seem to think of yourself as such a free thinker.
Your lashing out at women you clearly do not know is really quite a clue into your true character or lack of.

Answer 2

In asking this question you are the one that is coming off sounding like a shrew. Gender is actually a social construct and this has been proven again and again. We socialize our kids to the roles that we assume they should have. Go into a store and see what the toys are like in both sections and there is a good example of social construction. Even when you look at the bedrooms in furniture magazines girls have pastels and boys the primary colors.
Calling this fact a lie sounds pretty shrewish or just catty to me. Check out the facts before you start making up things. Feminists are looking for equality for everyone not just women, that kind of went out with the sixties stuff. Now they have third wave which deals with all kinds of social inequality.
You should read some of the stuff Baba Yaga writes it is pretty powerful and you could learn something from the women who post here instead of relying on the claws being out.
The fact that feminism ever happened makes you being able to have access to a computer in the first place. You could be home with twelve kids and a husband who expects you to wash his feet when he gets in the door. Think about that.

Answer 3

Where are you getting your definition of feminism? Is it shrewish to expect equal pay for equal work? Is it anti-feminine to expect be free from sexual harrassment at work? Does opposition to barbaric practices in other countries such as clitorectomy and immolation "perpetuate the lie that gender is a social construct"?
Call me a shrew if you like, but it beats being a doormat. Good luck to you.

Answer 4

Not true in every case. Not every feminist is an extremist bra-burning lesbian, man basher. A grounded feminist just recognizes that women need to be treated equal and fairly. And gender is a social construct. Take any history, psychology, social problem course.

Answer 5

During the sixties, feminism got caught up in the social activism inspired by the civil right and anti-war movements. To rally the masses, the enemy (man, patriarchy) must be portrayed as unambiguously evil (demonized). Relations between the sexes are nuanced, varied, and complex. However, feminist theoreticians advocated a simplistic, dualist (man against women, evil against good) view of society so that the feminist struggle could be seen as moral and heroic, thereby fostering camaraderie. With the devil as your enemy, you get the euphoria of being a potential martyr to the cause.

Answer 6

If you are actually interested in the answer to your question, the first thing you need to stop doing is generalizing. Just like ANY other viewpoint, there are many different people who share the view of feminism. ALL of these people are different, which is one of their main arguments. Generalizing based on gender roles (by the way, gender IS a social construct) is harmful. Such generalizations allow the most powerful, or large groups of less powerful, to push their ideals on others. Like: women should be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen, or women should do the cleaning, or women should not be able to hold political office etc.etc.

Answer 7

Gender is a social construct. Oh my God everyone knows that unless you have been living in the trees. The only shrew around here is you by the sounds of things.

Answer 8

Nope; sorry. you are able to inspire each and every of the "imaginative" although you %, however the reality of the issue is that the "Shew" of the call is Kate, and purely Kate. regardless of the undeniable fact that...it is to not say that there is not irony surrounding Kate's being a shrew, and substantial doubt to no remember if she is "tamed." look, there's no getting around the reality that Kate is an absolute HELLION in the earliest scenes of this play. She's beating the holy crud out of Bianca's suitors -- and Bianco, too, for that remember -- yet, if those issues is sensitively and intelligently dealt with in production, we'd all understand that Kate has each and every suitable to be furious approximately havign to undergo a society that places such huge tension on her to wed, in order that as that her bubble-headed bimbo of a youthful sister can entertain all of her many suitors. In different words, definite, Kate's a shrew...yet she has each and every reason to be. How puzzling could or not it quite is for Kate to observe adult males sniffing round her youthful sister all day long. do not you think of SHE craves love and companionship and marriage, too? needless to say she does. check out the scene the place Petruchio fails to take place on time for their wedding ceremony. Kate is heartbroken. And, as general, her father is oblivious to her quandary, questioning aloud how all of this is going to mirror on HIM. And Kate shall we him have it, in a speech that quite cuts suitable to the midsection of her character. it quite is the single which starts off "No shame yet mine!" particular she's a shrew. Who does not be, having to undergo that style of nonsense. you notice the way it works? And, as quickly as we are presented to Kate as a shrew for sturdy reason, then the floor is wisely laid for Petruchio's quite "taming," which has some distance much less to do with abuse and humiliation than present day productions could have you ever suspect, and each little thing to do with conserving a mirror as much as Kate, so as that she will see the actual (and unfavorable) consequences of her behaviors. the large irony of the play is that, as a Romatic Comedy (sorry, all you radical feminists, yet that's what it quite is), Kate and Petruchio grow to be the only useful and thriving couple in the piece. on the tip of the play, Kate and Petruchio are off to mattress to consummate their marriage, on an identical time as the different couples (Lucentio and Bianca, Hortensio and the Widow) are left observing one yet another, questioning why in God's call they ever concept to marry.

Answer 9

I do not think feminists are" shrews." The bad reputation of feminists came from the fact that some people generalize all strong women as something bad.
A feminist can believe in equal rights,equal pay and the right to rise above the "Glass Ceiling" in the corporate world and still be all woman .

Answer 10

There are plenty of feminists out there who aren't opposed to femininity when the situation calls for it. I can be the girliest girl imaginable when I want to, however rarely that is. However, I prefer being a harpy. That's just who I am. It's a hell of a lot better than being a doormat.