How come a U.S. president is limited to only 2 terms but other political positions don't have that limitation?

Question

I live in Chicago and the same mayor has been elected every time for the past 20 years. Isn't that considered a dictatorship? I like to hear your thoughts on terms.

Answer 1

Good question, but technically not right.

A US President is limited to 2 ELECTED terms of 4 years each. However, no person can hold the Presidential office more then 10 years.

How is it 10? Let's say.... Our current President dies in office, with 2 years on his term to go. The Vice President would become President, and finish the two years, then can run for the office himself. If he won the office, he then could hold it for the 4 years, and run again to be re-elected for an additional 4 years.

As for the rest, all offices have different terms. For instance, some cities allow Mayors to have unlimited terms, but it also runs for the same for sherrifs, judges, prosecutors, district attorneys, coroners...

And, some NON elected positions are also LIFETIME appointments, such as the judges on the Supreme Court.

Pretty much, it boils down to this: If they are doing a bad job, then the public would not re-elecct them.

Answer 2

It's not considered a dictatatorship if he was voted in . And if you would take a look at the canidates running against him, you would surely have to agree he is the best one for the job. Chicago has a very "colorful" past regarding politics & corruption, but I will take my chance with Daley, rather than dealing with Dorothy Brown, and all the corruption she has going on regarding our court system. I don't agree with everything Daley does, but he is the least of all evil, regarding his contenders.
Regarding the limit of terms a Mayor should be allowed to have, I don't think there should be a limit. The election is for the city, and the people should have a choice. If the Mayor is good and the voters want to keep him around then so be it. It only effects the city not the county, state, or federal Govt.
I grew up in Chicago and I always liked having a Daley as Mayor, I know its just my opinion. But that is who I am voting for next week. I would hate to think what would happen if any of the other canidates won.
I grew up in and still live in Bridgeport, the same neighborhood that the Daley's, and other Chicago Mayors came from. Its a good community, with deep tradition, where neighbors look out for each other, and truly become your extended family. I have never lived any where else that had such a close community feeling. Daley was raised with this sense of community, he truly looks out for our city. He loves this city so much! Right now I don't see a better canidate for the job.

Answer 3

Basically because no legislature has been passed against it. I'm pretty sure the presidency was limited after Roosevelt had four terms, and that he actually proposed the bill himself... the mayor's success isn't considered a dictatorship because he's elected, and there are other candidates there. Seems that the majority of the people in the windy city just want to elect the same mayor.

Answer 4

You're right. There should be an amendment limiting terms to every public office. Senates should only serve 4 terms, Representatives should serve 8 ( 2 years for each term). Robert Byrd has been in the Senate for 9 terms! He is 89 years old, how could he serve us properly just as Ted Kennedy has been in office since 1962. This is a democracy not a dictactorship. Mayor should only be elected to two terms as Governors have. Every councilmember should serve two terms also and there should be recall elections. Let's regain back our democracy.

Answer 5

All elected officials should be limited to 2 terms.

If an official in whatever office, mayor, governor, senator, etc, is particularly popular, and/or well liked, then maybe a special provision would allow the chance for a 3rd term, but that's it.

The problem with America is too many career politicians who get into office and make pork, partisanship and taking bribes their careers---this is why nothing ever changes.

Answer 6

Bush is a good example for not re -electing for more than two terms and I'm sorry, but the people of Chicago keep electing
that mayor so he must be doing something right. could you
picture Bush saying the course for two more term if your child
was fight this war ?.

Answer 7

There's a huge difference between being mayor of a city and the president of the USA.

Answer 8

I love term limits. the idea of getting fresh and new people all the time should be good for a republic. And Chicago is "all in the family." I lived north of their Lake County and hated your tax structure. In lake county too. Because ventually Cook taxes will be given to the surrounding counties also.

Answer 9

No that's going to no longer persist with to husbands and better halves. it relatively is purely whining from people who do in comparison to Clinton. If there are sufficient of you who do no longer she is purely no longer elected so what's there to fret approximately. If there are no longer sufficient - why ought to her husband's fomer profession provide up the folk from getting the president they choose. As for what would take place if laura Bush ran - i think of we'd all have an incredibly stable snicker. And with appreciate on your final remark - what has a 1947 constitutional modification have been given to do with what this u . s . a . grow to be in line with?

Answer 10

yes mayor Daily is a dictator. but a mayor of a city has no athourity over extreme matters such as war so the governemtn doesn't feel threatened by his overwhelming power. someone does need to get Daily out of office though, the man is a walking ego. the problem with him is he has so many friends in high places that he has kind of taken root and it is going to take some powerful weed killer to get rid of him