Is that Clinton's key legacy???
Or, do you just block facts out of your mind?
2007-02-17 06:17:37 · 11 answers · asked by junglejoe 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
couldnt agree with you more. heres a few more things about clinton the pelosi playbook misses
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
2007-02-17 06:20:51 · answer #1 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Tragedy has no longer some thing to do with 9/11 from an American attitude......... study the followings and also you opt for for your self a sad hero is individual who, on his personal volition, tries to comprehend or take care of a cost besides the undeniable fact that he's conscious of he's risking his existence hence and loses his or her existence throughout the time of that volatile conflict for the cost which he sees to be higher than his or her personal existence. study heavily and choose no matter if that is the suicidal bombers or the persons experienced a tragedy enable me handle the characteristics of tragedy for you: He must be properly suggested about his difficulty. He ought to deliberately attempt to finish a virtuous act. He must be sane to probability his existence in substitute of the cost he seeks for. He ought to lose his existence or a worthwhile asset in his existence or he ought to conflict through on the top of his action. If someone tells you some thing diverse about what tragedy is, basically spit at his or her face... once you've any added question to ask, basically question me.... "Nietzche and Hegel are "nobodies" for me in this appreciate" .... Aristotle so some distance because the poetics is worried isn't even a "no one" Tragic flaw is misjudgement or miscalculation. it is a mild mistakes which wouldnt in the different case make a sad individual a base one. yet a real tragic hero doesnt want to have a sad flaw in any respect. Does Antigone have a sad flaw? NOOOO... What about Oedipus? NOOOOO...
2016-12-04 07:25:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean while Clinton fought off a Republican witch hunt.
Had it not been for the foolishness of the Republicans, President Clinton would have got Bin Laden. So it is safe to say the Republican witch hunt contributed to the events of 9/11.
2007-02-17 06:20:13 · answer #3 · answered by itsdabigbadwolf 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yeah... and the Republican controlled congress constantly said he should do something about it...
OH WAIT, THEY DIDN'T SAY A WORD? in fact, they made even fewer moves than Clinton against terror and when Clinton hit Osama with missiles, they said that Osama wasn't a threat and that it was a big distraction?
so, should Clinton have launched missiles at Osama or, was he not a threat?
Is that the republican congress' legacy?
or do you just block facts out of your mind?
2007-02-17 06:41:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nobody at the flight schools resported any one of them as an odd case. Do you actually think any President knows that level of detail about the goings on in this country? After all 911 happened on Bush's watch-he claimed not to know it was coming.
2007-02-17 06:21:13 · answer #5 · answered by melouofs 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We just block out that part and concentrate on what a loser bush is. Clinton will be back.
2007-02-17 06:20:16 · answer #6 · answered by Fireman T 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. That little fact gets in the way of them saying that it's all Bush's fault.
2007-02-17 06:20:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No-one likes a gloater...
But good point.. hmmm... but it could have happened to the republicans too.
You can't prevent EVERYTHING
2007-02-17 06:21:16 · answer #8 · answered by Trey 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The pilots were CIA operatives. Did you know that?
2007-02-17 06:20:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
whatever............and Bush has found those weapons of mass destruction right?
2007-02-17 06:20:54 · answer #10 · answered by Turtleshell 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋