2007-02-17 06:06:39 · 14 answers · asked by junglejoe 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well, George W has probably done more harm to this nation than any president in living memory. Historians are already comparing his impact to all time bad presidents. He isn't corrupt, just, simply, not intelligent enough, and have the management skills required, to be a good prsident.
2007-02-17 06:13:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
This question really made me laugh. Lincoln was your typical Republican, a corporate attorney for the Illinois Central Railroad and good at PR. If he had no malice, what was the Civil War all about? He got over 600,000 Americans killed and destroyed half the country during that debacle.
As far as hateful toward Bush, it is derived from the eight years of hate directed toward Clinton. No insult was too low for the right wing when it came to "Slick Willy and Billary and ugly Chelsea and stupid Socks the Cat." They dragged America into the mud with their $60M+ investigation into Bill's underwear and now you want everyone to just get along??? Not bloody likely!
2007-02-17 06:18:36 · answer #2 · answered by realst1 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are you admitting that Dictator Dumbya commited acts of rebellion against the Constitution (just like the Confederates did) in the crooked shamlections of 2000 and 2004? If he surrenders his occupation of the White House NOW, I would have no malice and find some charity for Dumbya, (as in the Lincon speech).
2007-02-17 06:18:31 · answer #3 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because Bush refuses to let the Libs live in ignorant bliss. The Libs so often want to pretend things are ok until it is too late. Bush is like a splash of cold water in their faces. It like if you were some loser guy in his thirties, still living in his parents' basement, smoking dope all day and listening to Led Zeppelin. Then some guy comes in, tells you to get a job, and get a decent haircut. That's Bush. Bush has to be the adult.
2007-02-17 06:16:51 · answer #4 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
what's comparable is the circumstances because of the fact the third Reich became into getting started as in the early 1930's and not while the repression there became into in complete tilt as in the early '40s. we've had 2 crooked shamlections and voters lesser in the pecking order abducted by ability of fiat of a "unitary government" study dictator, between different insults to the form. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2016-11-23 15:12:32 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, Bush is not part of the Confederate states of America. Second, ouch, I'm a liberal. Third, Bush might deserve all that he is getting. When Obama takes office, we'll see if he can fix what Liberals criticize. If he can't, then you can say that Liberals are hateful.
2007-02-17 06:15:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lincoln was not a liberal. They only apply those rules to the rest of us. They consider malice "patriotic."
2007-02-17 06:10:02 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's not just liberals, it's politics in general. Ask a question about Hillary or Slick Willy and see what kind of response you get from the conservative side.
Oh, and Lincoln was a Republican.
2007-02-17 06:10:53 · answer #8 · answered by spewing_originality 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
because lincoln was a republican.
if you want democrats, look at andrew jackson and what he did to the natives.
2007-02-17 06:26:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Strange I live in a Liberal College town and never notice that.
It must be regional.
Go big Red Go
2007-02-17 06:10:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋