America's attack on Iraq is right or wrong?

Answer 1

It wasn't on Iraq it was on saddam.
What we are doing establishing a democarcy.

It is right to get rid of dicator who used chemical wepons on his people, funded sucide bombers, and hiding terrorist is right yes.
It is wrong than you must love all three.

Answer 2

Wrong...
Iraq was attacked based on the fact that there are WMD,which weren't found until today and because Saddam is a threat and Iraq must be liberate...Well no Iraqi asked US to come and save them,and no Iraqi ask for the kind of democracy that US is trying to force on them...
Middle East was not a very stable area,but now,with this war it became even more unstable and unfortunately instead of ending terrorism ,attacking Iraq made more people hate US and more people are willing to attack it...

Answer 3

i think clinton was even for the attack just that he wanted more global support before we went in there. I think it may have been the right idea if it was a breeding ground for terrorists but i dont have 1st hand knowledge of that being the case. I think it was a premature decision and hence the wrong decision. But better too early than too late so I can't fault it.

Answer 4

it's been wrong since the beginning. Largest protests in the history of the world to try to prevent that war. We were labeled as unpatriotic, as terrorists, etc. Now, guess what? They should have listened to us and our arguments, but all we got was name calling. Typical.

Answer 5

Wrong.

Answer 6

wrong