2007-02-17 05:00:09 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Economics
Is globalization fair? It is as fair as aging. As the technical capability of the human race increases, communication become faster and distances become shorter. This breaks old barriers, allowing knowledge and products to flow to places were it previously was impossible. Just as humans age, so does the human race and globalization is just a facet of growth, much like puberty but on a global scale.
2007-02-21 04:43:58 · answer #1 · answered by MSDC 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whether it's fair or not, it's an accomplished fact. Actually, wild & landless capitalism, its using it on their favor, against interests from week undeveloped countries. Even though, if its carefully regulated, it would be a good instrument to minimize differences between poor and wealthy countries, making the world more fair to every human being.
2007-02-17 13:46:10 · answer #2 · answered by robertonereo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it can't be. There will still be the haves and the have-nots.
The poorest, under developed nations will still be at the mercy ot the more powerful and wealthy.
On the other hand, if the socialists take over, as they did her in the last election, we will all suffer, as they go about redistributing the wealth of the working class to those that produce nothing.
2007-02-17 13:14:07 · answer #3 · answered by The Parthian 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. No solution can be fair to all sections of people all over the world. But it is an inevitable solution in this age of internet and different time zones, need for economy and thus possibility of outsourcing of parts, products, assemblies and services.
2007-02-17 13:09:30 · answer #4 · answered by Swamy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a concept, economically it should be.
As a practice, so far, no way.
Western nations still push developing nations to open their doors to trade, yet refuse to drop horrendous subsidies to the agricultural sector of their own nations. And agriculture, to many developing countries, is the one sector in which they could do very well globally.. if they had a level playing field.
Peace
2007-02-18 10:25:06 · answer #5 · answered by zingis 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It allows global monopoly. That is the highest form of selfishness. It destroys cultures because people change their needs like the way of "first world contries" and forget their own.
2007-02-17 13:35:52 · answer #6 · answered by Sanse07 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because instead of every town having a poor ghetto, whole entire regions will be the ghetto and the good side of "town". Anyone who lived near the bad part of town would know why that is a bad thing.
2007-02-17 13:08:21 · answer #7 · answered by gotagetaweigh 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell no. Different cultures have different needs. Also everyone suffers because we lose the diversity of these cultures. Its a McDonald's, Disneyland mentality.
2007-02-17 13:05:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing is fair to everyone.
2007-02-17 13:11:35 · answer #9 · answered by Nora P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope it isn't. globalisation for all it's benefits, cannot help every single person in the world. there are those who will give more and reap less in return and those who put in a little and get great returns.
2007-02-17 13:08:56 · answer #10 · answered by rfedrocks 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋