Bush has US troops fighting in Iraq with "one hand tied behind their backs" which makes it practically impossible to win the war in Iraq. Why would Bush put US troops in such unneccessary danger especially against an enemy that breaks all the "rules"? Yes, libs are hurting US military in Iraq by callilng for a withdraw but if Bush had given US troops much more leeway on the rules of engagement, 3 YEARS ago, they would probably have already won the war in Iraq by now.
2007-02-17 04:51:59 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
thanks for asking this question, I am sure you will get a lot of static from some of our bleeding hearts, but, just read history , no war has ever been won be being P.C. and people do die , if you are not willing to kill then don't go to war, but, if you do go to war fight to win, there is no way I would ever reenlist, not when they want to put you in prison for killing the enemy, why should I let some one get a free shot at me before I can shoot back, after all this one might know how to shoot and if so I won't be around to shoot back,Generals MacArthur and Patton both stated after WW2 America would never win another war .and we haven't.
yes our men are capable and could win if our bleeding hearts would get out of the way, we could win in 90 days,
2007-02-17 05:34:10 · answer #1 · answered by james w 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Considering Saddam could not control the borders of Iraq with a million soldiers how could the Americans with half that amount. Same bunch were sneaking weapons across then as now, only difference we hear of their attacks now. OK some of the weapons were been brought in by the CIA and Mossad to be used on the Iraqi people. I do recall a few explosions mentioned in Baghdad before the War targeted at civilians just were not on Fox news are any news agency really. Who cared at all that some Sunni's were been killed until some Americans were on the ground caught up in the mess.
2016-05-23 22:53:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can thank the liberals who'd whine if too many people die, whether it be civilians our troops or even the enemy!
And you can thank the liberal media for putting every little thing that our troops or leadership do that may be viewed as an accident, misjudgment or a disaster under the microscope. That's all the media shows is our missteps over there and blows it out of proportion!
2007-02-17 04:58:24 · answer #3 · answered by Bunz 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It is the bleeding heart libs and their press that are handcuffing the troops. The troops get shot at from a mosque...they are not allowed to return fire for fear of damaging the mosque. The terrorists shoot from inside a house...the troops return fire and kill the insurgents along with 3 family members in the house...the news comes out..Troops kill family...not about the terrorists fighting from that house. Our troops(not all are good) rape a young lady...WE PROSECUTE HIM...the terrorists kidnap and behead on TV 3 innocents...rape gets 3 days of front page...TV beheadings gets 2 paragraphs inside for 1 day...It IS NOT GW handcuffing the troops. IT IS THE TERRORISTS SUPPORTING LIBS
2007-02-17 05:03:41 · answer #4 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Send in the B-52's to carpet bomb the cities. Then send in the tanks to flatten the rubble. To hell with civilian casualties. The bad-guys are living among them so just wipe them ALL out! This is the way you win wars. You don't win by being PC.
2007-02-17 05:05:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
*LOL* because liberals get up tight if every person killed is not carrying at least an AK47.
They think this whole thing should be a civil war. Well I have a clue for them. War is never civil. Being civil stops when the bullets start flying. Civil restarts when they stop!
2007-02-17 04:56:41 · answer #6 · answered by namsaev 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i agree.
i'd just like to say though, that Bush does have a couple hundred crybabies who are looking over his shoulder and hollering and complaining if he does anything at all. just look at how they act about the terrorists locked up at Gitmo. guess we should let them out. if we do i vote the crybabies need to go take care of them. let them see up close and personal the people they're so anxious to protect.
2007-02-17 05:00:11 · answer #7 · answered by political junkie 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
we wont win the war without proper care for Iraqi civilians
2007-02-17 04:59:56 · answer #8 · answered by Evil Man 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The rules of engagement that you bemoan stops the military from slaughtering innocent men, women, and children.
If you want us to burn cities and rape and pillage, just remember that there will be consequences.
2007-02-17 04:58:54 · answer #9 · answered by ck4829 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I wish I knew
2007-02-17 04:56:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋