2007-02-17 04:48:20 · 11 answers · asked by Eyota Xin 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yeah i can see the terrorists celebrating side by side the democrats on that one. why do libs show partiality to terrorists and despise the troops?
2007-02-17 04:52:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
They're getting to it. There is a Constitutional process they must follow - and they are. If the wingnut in the White House doesn't pay any attention and continues to do things we, the people don't want, and Congress had asked him to stop, the purse strings will be cut - just like the Vietnam mess.......
2007-02-17 07:16:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yet yet another Democrat who won't be in a position to detect any distinction between signing a finances with a large type of spending in it vs annoying much extra spending and ordering nevertheless extra without as much as a "via your go away" to Congress. Why does NO Obama supporter understand OBAMA'S place in this? OBAMA suggested our deficits below Bush have been SUSTAINABLE, yet purely slightly. OBAMA suggested spending to any extent further might genuinely kill-off the country. OBAMA individually demanded checklist ESCALATION of spending and nevertheless calls for ongoing and everlasting escalation of the debt - perpetually. Why do NO Democrats have any problem with that?
2016-10-02 07:21:11 · answer #3 · answered by lutz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why stop at funding?
The Legislative should freeze all of Bush's Judicial Nominees and any potential cabinet members, should launch scores of investigations, order the White House to become more transparent, and forbid any future military ventures that the Administration proposes.
2007-02-17 04:55:38 · answer #4 · answered by ck4829 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh, sure. Get even with Bush by cutting our troops off at the knees. Not a very nice plan you're cooking up there.
2007-02-17 04:59:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
What will you do with all the troops that would be abandoned? What are you going to do when Iraq implodes? This is absurdity and ignorance writ large. From your statement I think you hate America and all for which she stands. You should be ashamed of making wreck less and irresponsible statements like the one you have posted.
2007-02-17 04:59:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather them stand by their convictions and what they believe in; instead of coming out with these wasteful non-binding resolutions that do nothing!
But to cut funding for the war would be a terrible decision!
2007-02-17 04:54:35 · answer #7 · answered by Bunz 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Of course they should. But they care more about getting reelected and getting invited to cocktail parties than they care about the lives of our soldiers or stability in the Middle East.
2007-02-17 04:52:37 · answer #8 · answered by Duffman 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO
it would give republicans an excuse to cry that democrats don't support our troops, rather than looking at reality that the person who would leave them there dispite lack of funding is the person who doesn't support them.
2007-02-17 04:53:28 · answer #9 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
YES! That is the only way to stop the madness!
2007-02-17 04:57:06 · answer #10 · answered by KCBA 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋