Yes, by far.
2007-02-17 04:44:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
How can you even put Bush and humanitarian in the same sentence? Didn't you watch as he left the gulf coast to wallow in it's own filth after Katrina? Didn't you see the WTC destroyed so he would have an excuse to start his war? Haven't you been paying attention as he sends troops to Iraq to die for nothing? http://www.jonhs.net/911/ Humanitarian, you're joking right?
2007-02-17 13:35:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by rick m 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I like to think I have some knowledge of humanism and humanitarianism and frankly that imbecile couldn't spell them let alone know their definitions.
2007-02-17 12:45:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
oh fer sure. GW sure shocked and awed the Iraqis with his compassion. the folks drowning in Katrina's flood waters were certainly impressed with the sincerity of GW's guitar playing. all them old folks struggling to get their meds thank GW for his kindness as they decide whether to be in pain or eat that day. and all of America's poor folks are so much more healthy and happy now that social programs have been cut to the bone. and i'm sure we're all filled with gratitude as we pay twice as much for gas and food as we did 6 yrs ago.
but no doubt those who are the most impressed with GW's humanitarian tendencies are those with stock in Big Oil and the Military Industrial Complex. they, being in America's most vulnerable citizens, certainly needed GW to step in on their behalf with tax cuts, no bid contracts and corporate welfare. a friend in need is a friend indeed.
PS. oops! forgot to note how GW's agape love for his fellow humans translates into legalizing torture in US military prisons.
2007-02-17 13:30:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by nebtet 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Do you call killing thousands in Iraq and leaving Katerina victims ( high and dry ) , a humanitarian . that's your opinion .
2007-02-17 12:48:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
And he'd tell you as much. If he could pronounce "humanitarian".
2007-02-17 12:45:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No...he just wants power over every country in the world. Read the Constitution.....we are not suppose to give foreign aid to any other nation.
2007-02-17 12:45:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by TexasRose 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
only if ordering the bombing of humans is considered humanitarian
2007-02-17 12:43:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by anonacoup 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
This is a joke right?
Are you really serious with this question?
hahahahahah... I hope not.
The guy is the scourge of humanity
2007-02-17 12:49:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Eyota Xin 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm sure all the dead and mutilated American soldiers and innocent Iraq civilians think so.
Are you nuts?
2007-02-17 12:45:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by S. G 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
yes. he deserves Saint Hood
2007-02-17 12:42:04
·
answer #11
·
answered by Sean 4
·
1⤊
0⤋