2007-02-17 03:30:55 · 9 answers · asked by nvp 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
US military have killed thousands of Iraqi civilian, Bush have to spend on health of Iraqi people.
2007-02-17 04:10:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even if the billions of dollars were not being spent in Iraq the Bush administration would not be spending the money on people's health care. The money would be being used for more tax relief for the rich.
2007-02-17 11:39:49 · answer #2 · answered by supressdesires 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Health care is a private not government concern so given those two war. Although the money would probably be better spent on securing the border and investing in American businesses to create more jobs.
2007-02-17 11:35:34 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Pibb 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
well, republicans want to keep health care a business in the US. Bush wants to make oil cheaper in the US and make it appear that we're safer, so he's spending money on the war.
2007-02-17 12:14:40 · answer #4 · answered by !{¤©¤}! 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If he doesn't spend the money on the war, there will be no need for healthcare. The war is what is keeping terrorists OUT of America.
2007-02-17 11:41:10 · answer #5 · answered by Cookie Monster 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Prez should spent money war after war, and about peoples health? the markets will TAKE CARE, don't worry be merry.
2007-02-17 11:38:21 · answer #6 · answered by satya r 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
People's health of course, but right now Health Care is a private matter in the United States.
2007-02-17 11:36:49 · answer #7 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'll pay for the war if you pay for the social handouts for the bums
2007-02-17 11:36:59 · answer #8 · answered by John 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Both. The us is wealthy enough it does not have to choose.
2007-02-17 11:37:15 · answer #9 · answered by Bobby Cretin 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋