I think this have something to do with the angles. 2 triangles joined by the same vertex. Thats the way the camera recieves the image and prints it.
2007-02-17 03:16:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by minine 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We cant compare the photograph with geometry, because photography is two dimensional property,it show a 2-D view of matter it may be a human or nature. But the geometry is calculated and well versed portion of a area.
2007-02-17 12:47:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Opposite direction 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
What springs to my mind is "perspective".
Look up a long road - You know the sides of the road never really meat, but when you look towards the horizon, the sides of the road DO look like they meet, making a tall thin triangle.
What angels does this apparent triangle have?
How long do the sides appear to be?
Well, you get the idea. Just imagine looking at a house. You know the basic shape is a rectangle, but if you look at it sideways, then it looks more like a trapezium.
Many great artists have been fascinated with perspective and Leonardo da Vinci did a lot of work on perspective and geometery
I hope this helps!
2007-02-17 11:06:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by TK_M 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
When you take a picture of a landscape, you reproduce the objects at a much smaller size. You couldn't fit a whole mountain and a whole tree on a small 4x6 paper. This means you're using proportions to reproduce the images. We use proportions in geometry for things like verifying similarity of triangles.
2007-02-17 11:04:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i am not a photographer
2007-02-20 05:55:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by irfan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋