liberals don't care how many people die or suffer as long as they are in control.
2007-02-17 02:22:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Curious_One 3
·
5⤊
2⤋
Take a look at the facts. Read the Downing Street Memo, check out the advance warnings that we had of the September 11 attacks. Look at news footage of General Wallace saying at the beginning of the war in Iraq that our boys were not prepared for these war games. Remember Bin Laden? We go into Iraq instead of hunting down the criminals of 9-11. The Constitution has been violated, and Halliburton gets a no-bid conatract to rebuild Iraq and charges American soldiers huge prices for items like soda for profit. Billions and billions of dollars have simply disappeared. This would make for a comedy of errors except for the fact that it has caused such human suffering. Impeach? You bet- by the way Cheyney has really been calling the shots. I have alreaday signed my name to impeach the two of them. Cheyney and his puppet. The blood of many innocent people is on their hands. As each day passes, more and more people are seeing the truth. Remember that fear is a great tool to use in order to achieve a means and control people. The real terrorists often are the people who are wolves in sheeps' clothing and are right in front of us.
2007-02-17 10:59:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Patriot 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your question is not really a question for liberals is it? Would it make you happy if 10,000 Americans died in a terror attack, so you could hope to have a different point of entry for your band wagon?
Your point is mute. Soon enough Bush will officially be a lame duck. Maybe before that happens, he will do something that improves his point ratings, the lowest in the entire history of the USA, to at least return some favor from the Republican party. Let's hope so. That would be a welcomed change, wouldn't you agree?
signed: a Moderate that votes by issues and records of performance and not just a straight party ticket.
2007-02-17 10:28:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by ... 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
That is why their resolution is "no-binding". Their more unsure of their ideas, and wasteing precious time and energy with trying once again to please people, rather than follow through. I'm amazed at the republicans turning on the president and backing out of what they were so sure of when all this started. I have no respect for anyone trying to switch boats half way down river, especially the ones that voted go, and now we're there cry, come back.
2007-02-17 10:40:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Where does a question like yours come from? People who disagree with the President's policies don't want any people killed to see him impeached. You guys are nothing but doom and gloom and fear and terror. That type of politics is hopefully on the decline.
2007-02-17 10:37:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
well, technically cheney would be president until jan. of 09 unless he runs for president and wins, which he already said he wasn't going to do. impeachment doens't mean cheney gets to be dictator for life with no elections ever.
2007-02-17 10:22:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Matt 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Libs would dance in the streets.
Look at how they're fighting closing the border.
Come election time ,it'll be what a failure everything has been and not a word how they got in the way.
2007-02-17 10:57:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Stereotyping people is wrong and dangerous. It is like saying that since Mark Foley and Ted Haggard are gay Republicans, all male Republicans are gay. Do you see how silly your statement and my statement is? They make no logical sense.
2007-02-17 10:34:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tom B 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hate to say this, but the Democrats are positioning themselves to get annihilated in '08.
2007-02-17 10:27:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Only if they were all conservatives.
2007-02-17 10:24:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by douglas l 5
·
0⤊
2⤋