USA must protect the world... right?
2007-02-17 00:32:28 · 11 answers · asked by urbanbard7 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
who else should? much is given much is required isn't it? and it so happens that policing is one of it.
2007-02-17 00:41:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The world is much more developed now than before so the USA will have to reduce its policing power, which we have by co-founding the United Nations. The UN's agenda to police the world. Those on the security council should aid an equal share in sending troops to fulfill a mission, 10% of their military force and national gross profit to end major conflicts outlined by Augustine, http://www.voteprimous.com
2007-02-17 09:04:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wrong. The US is not the world's police. NATO and troops from several countries are trying to control Afghanistan. A coalition of troops, led by the US and Great Britain, are trying to control Iraq. No one, especially the US, is trying to control things in Somalia and Sudan.
Our government is trying to protect the interests of the American people. That's what the government is supposed to do. If you disagree with the President, and have a better idea, let him know.
2007-02-17 08:39:40 · answer #3 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, it is NOT up to the USA to police the world. If Bush supporters would actually listen to what Bush has said.....they would know he has lied from day one. In one (first)campaign debate, he stated that he would pull all the troops out of all the countries that we were/are in. He said he would bring them home. He, himself said we had no business policing the world. So, with that being said, why are we invading the world now?? Huh??
2007-02-17 08:44:46 · answer #4 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We must. If we don't our economy is threatend as well as our way of life. Holocausts would occur as they still do as in Dafur.
We need to police the world because th U.N. is a waste.
John McCain is the only candidate whom speaks openly about his true intentions and his plans are written here for the whole world to see.
Even if you do not agree with all of them at least when you cast your vote for him you will have NO doubt what to expect.
Here it is in black and white.
2007-02-17 08:41:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, the USA must eliminate the terrorists. We are their number one target. We are protecting our own interest.
2007-02-17 10:20:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This issue came up one hundred years ago, when another Republican was president. His motto was “Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick.” I tend to follow his point of view on that subject.
But, he also opposed "Hyphenated Americans," too, so I know my reference to a President ranked always between #3 and #7 by historians as one of the top 10 Presidents of the United States of America, may get me a thumb down or ten; but, who gives a flying crap?
2007-02-17 09:01:50 · answer #7 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The USA only needs to protect the USA.
Often times, out of generosity we choose to help other people. But they should not expect our help, only just be grateful if/when we do.
2007-02-17 08:41:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If the USA is not the most dominate country in the world,who would you rather it be? Iran,North Korea,China...........?
2007-02-17 08:37:39 · answer #9 · answered by roysbigtoys 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately, someone has to do it since the UN won't do its job.
2007-02-17 08:37:08 · answer #10 · answered by fixinto 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋