English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For any work energy is required, can there be a situation when this energy supply becomes zero? or the moving electrons have consumed all the energy and the structure of atoms or molecules and the matter collapses. There cannot be perpetual motion without utilising energy. Newtons law of motion holds good in vaccum only....? The electrons say in silicon, a constitutent of quartz do not move in vaccum, so from where does this energy comes? and can this energy be tapped for commercial utilisation, remember we have trillions and trillions of atoms (in a few gram of different matter) all around us and we do not have to use fission or fussion techniques to create energy by splitting or by fusing nucleus...
If we can unlock this energy riddle of the moving electrons, may be one day our progeny can live in a better world with total energy security. I wish we can do it soon..

2007-02-16 23:12:20 · 4 answers · asked by mandira_nk 4 in Science & Mathematics Physics

4 answers

1. You are mistaken when you think a moving object consumes energy. Our Moon orbits the Earth without consuming energy.
2. An orbiting, and hence accelerating, electron would in classical Physics radiate electromagnetic radiation. If this were so, the electron would spiral into the nucleus in a few nanoseconds. However quantum Physics explains that there are stable orbits for the electron which do not radiate energy, hence atoms remain stable.

2007-02-17 02:51:14 · answer #1 · answered by AaronX 2 · 0 0

This view of electrons, as solid objects that physically orbit the nucleus, is not really a valid view anymore. In fact, the people whose job it is to think about such things, only used that model of the atom for about a year or so, up until about 85 or 90 years ago.

Get with the times. Your basic thinking is way, way out of date.

Thunder is not caused by angels bowling, either.

2007-02-16 23:52:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Your question is valid. There is movement of electrons about an atom, and a person would wonder what form of energy it is that keeps them in existence.

The answer is in the nature of the electron itself. This small unit of mass is composed of electromagnetic energy. This is seen when a high frequency photon enters near the nucleus of an atom and is formed into negative and positive electrons. The formation of the electron, being that of electromagnetic energy, retains the value of that form of energy. One aspect of a photon is its continual speed of "c". Even though an electron is formed, the value of "c" does not cease to exist.

Electrons are formed into becoming a mass by their frequency completing an arc of more than 360 and the frequency bonding to itself. In doing this the electron forms into three parts. The southern region is formed into mass (offers resistence to movement). The equatorial region is the electric field, and the northern region expanding magnetic waves. These three parts, though no longer seen as a photon, are what the photon is in three dimensions. When an electron comes apart it returns to a high frequency photon again, and the mass is no longer existent.

Lastly, electrons all have a basic frequency that comprises the entire entity - the same as do neutrons and protons. Neutrons and protons are formed of electrons, and electrons are able to move about the mass of these heavier pieces due to their frequencies being harmonic (able to respond to the same frequencies). Electrons, because they retain the value of "c" do not expend energy in their movement, they exist as being part of the mass they associate with (much like your arm exists as part of you but not all). There is no energy to gain from them due to movement reduction, unless the entire atom is taken apart.

2007-02-17 01:24:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

there is never such a thing as zero energy, even in a totally evacuated vacuum there is still some energy in there. And people are already trying to tap energy from vacuums

2007-02-16 23:53:22 · answer #4 · answered by Mutley! 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers