English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

many people do not realize that some forms of birth control, i.e., the i.u.d. (i'm not sure but it may only be one of the two models) and the progesterine-only birth control pill, are not contraceptives, but abortificients. meaning, they do not prevent pregnancy: they work by expelling fertilized eggs. this isn't about abortion: it is about our right to know this. women are being given these forms of birth control and not being told this is actually what they do. regardless of her beliefs on abortion, is it healthy for a woman's body to routinely fertilize and sterilize eggs??

2007-02-16 21:21:39 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

Proponents of birth control are deceiving people that they are fighting to stop population explosion but is actually using methods that are designed to prevent birth but is actually abortion. People must be informed as to what is legal to control birth instead of not showing it as abortion.

2007-02-16 21:28:11 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 2

What exactly should "PROGESTERIN" be? I believe this "Fraginal Akowhatever" answers approrpiately, saying that "Proponents of birth control [...] is actually using methods..." - he not only sounds retarded as Dumbya the Bush, he even has the same grammar! You two are a match made in heaven.

2007-02-16 21:34:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The government is deliberatly exterminating the White middle class

2007-02-16 21:58:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You have a long, long, LONG way to go before you're qulified to tell me what to do with my body.

2007-02-16 21:43:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

ugh

2007-02-16 21:24:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers