Britney always was exposed, showing off her privates, wearing way too daring clothes, and Lindsay Lohan was a really good girl, she has an amazing talent for acting and charisma and her voice isn't too bad either, she's better in singing than Hilary Duff anyway, but she started hanging with Paris Hilton, it's too obvious that whoever Paris hangs with ends up ruined, or wild like herself, and hurt. Britney, from the cute dancing diva to the overexposed mom, Lindsay from pretty parent trap girl to party girl. Who's gone too far?
2007-02-16 20:45:36 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
At least Lindsay is only shaming herself.
Britney has 2 poor children who are dependent on her. She is a selfish, cheap harlot.
2007-02-17 07:30:32 · answer #1 · answered by tray 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see what happened today (Britney going bald and getting several tatoos) as the end of the boring stupid vapid pop-princess Britney Spears and the beginning of a new rocker image that people over the age of 16 will recognize as making a bold move. She walked out of rehab and reinvented herself as a riot girrrll in ONE DAY! That's cool....while Lindsay Lohan stays in rehab like a good little girl whiile society uses Clockwork Orange techniques to turn her back into the same boring over-hyped under-talented loser she has always been. Hey this could spark a revolution...maybe that Britney wannabe, Christina Aguilera, will start singing Zeppelin and Vanilla Fudge songs and dump her rabbi husband for Ian Gillan!
2007-02-16 21:03:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would say Britney Spears has because she has kids to look after and is older than Lindsay who is probably just letting loose now she can do what she wants.....Britney has more responsibilites as a mother so she should know better. Lindsay is still young and so in way we can forgive her for just being a wild young free single party girl.......So basically I vote for Britney for having gone too far!!
2007-02-16 21:18:31 · answer #3 · answered by Seriously Though 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Britney is worse because she has children who she should be taking care of that probably wake up still at night hungry and it would be great if a loving mom would come in the room and care for them rather than a nanny...lindsay lohan is a young girl doing much the same things as college girls do...not that thats great
2007-02-17 03:03:30 · answer #4 · answered by tcb 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with celia r. but to the either two of them, mine is lindsay lohan because Lindsay Lohan I think is more projects have to accomplish since Britney Spears have been out in industry several years had past that makes her career gone
2007-02-16 20:52:59 · answer #5 · answered by shein_jacob 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I think what is worse is that Britney has children - she shouldn't be a party girl with two children...
Lindsay is a very talented and beautiful girl and it's sad that she ended up like that at 20!
I think what the two of them have in common is that they really haven't grown up yet and maybe they never will. - And so haven't Paris - or does she behave like a grown-up?
2007-02-16 22:36:29 · answer #6 · answered by FantasticVoyage 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Britney, is some ways....I am actually more worried about her little boys...and how she is taking care of them..and the mamma role model thing...(I am worried just because of what the stupid press writes about her...some of may be true...and is this a good thing for those sweet little boys?)
I do think that the media prints mostly non-truths..as I have had friends in the news, or magazines..and I don't like how "unkind" they have been to them....it is quite rude! They DO lie,,,and add on stuff that is NOT true...in fact, much of the articles are totally made up!
But, I also think that Britney(one of many singers I am a fan of) needs to start to really look at how it might affect her life, later...and or her little boys lives....because it can and it just might....she doesn't really know that...as she might not be thinking about this...but, she needs to!!! It's important...for their sakes....they are her babies!
2007-02-16 21:41:21 · answer #7 · answered by ladyk 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have to sat Lindsay Lohan ... leave Britney alone she`s not bothering anyone , but Lindsay has done drugs and been in rehab already at her tender age before being in tow with Paris ...to me that is too far ....
2007-02-16 21:35:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't mind when a celebrity self destructs. In fact, I like to look on in sadistic amusement. But Britney has crossed the line with what her pathetic life has degenerated into for the simple fact that she has taken two little kids down with her.
What a wonderful start to life she has given them. Mummy's snatch is now immortalised in print, guaranteed to haunt them during their school life. Sadly, this is the least of their problems.
And to the person that said that Lindsay once had talent....no, she didn't.
2007-02-16 21:33:29 · answer #9 · answered by Meg D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't mind a shot at the privates, but that Paris woman is just damaged goods. Would I still hit it. Hell yeah, but I'd hate myself in the morning.
I'd say they have gone too far in the aspect that their exhibitionism is going to limit their movie choices. I doubt Disney is interested in Paris, Britney, or Lindsay anymore, for the above reasons. Hey, they still have the adult movie industry to look forward to!
2007-02-16 20:48:59 · answer #10 · answered by Thegustaffa 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋