Do you agree with gay adoption?

Question

I don't, I believe it would be very disorienting for the child.

Answer 1

It wouldn't be disorienting to a child who is raised knowing only his gay parents. It would only be more disorienting to an older child who had previously had straight parents. The claim that it would be disorienting would be equivalent to a Japanese person saying they don't agree with American adoption becuse it must be very disorienting, simply because they're not American.

Answer 2

Peach this can be a troublesome one to respond to, and please do not enable this to be a set up for call calling and bashing because of someones opinion. You requested, and that i'm giving you an honest answer. My initial reaction will be to decline. a newborn is more beneficial advantageous of with a dynamic that includes a mom and a Father. in the previous, i'd stick through that answer, and nonetheless trust that provides a newborn the most ideal probability. immediately besides the undeniable fact that, our society has replaced. it is a godless one, and the dynamics of what constitutes a nuclear kinfolk have replaced to boot. For the more beneficial advantageous, no way. No way. reality besides the undeniable fact that, certain, and that is in trouble-free terms going to worsen. With that being suggested, a loving gay couple will be more beneficial advantageous off searching after a newborn than some heterosexual ones, and considering the definition of kinfolk has replaced for the more severe, i do not see why any 2 living organisms that say the affection one yet another ought to no longer undertake a touch one. i'm extreme the following, reason we is often talking someone and a canines some day adopting a newborn. giggle, yet they have rights to and want to be respected like a number of people else. :)

Answer 3

I think that one has to accept that being gay is part of our society. There are children with supposedly heterosexual parents who find out later in life that one parent is gay and had been concealing this information. So, there are adjustments that children need to make in many situations. I think that with adoption one should be judged the same as hetero people. Can the person)s) provide for the child's basic needs of food, clothing, shelter, education and then the emotional needs, love, understanding, tolerance etc. As a child grows older, it will be necessary to explain that their family is different maybe from their friends, that is 2 dads / 2 mums but considering the divorce rate, and dealing with stepparents and stepsiblings, life for many children is complicated.

Answer 4

Well, on the face value of it, I do not agree with gay adoption. I believe child rearing is best by both a mother and father. However, i would rather see a loving gay couple adopt a child rather than see that child in foster care or state run institutions. I would gladly set aside my own personal beliefs to see a child lead a more productive life. And no one can convince me that a child growing up in our horrible foster care system would be better off than living with a carin gay couple.

Answer 5

why shouldn't they be able to adopt? I can imagine there are many many gay parents out there who know how to raise kids better than some straight couples. I have heard plenty of abuse stories involving straight parents, but none yet on gay parents. If the child is provided with a loving home with two parents and food on the table, who are we to judge?

Answer 6

We all wonder when the end of the world will come,,,well if two men can marry and have all the rights a hetero couple can,and then adopt children,,,,your watching the end in motion. Whats next,a man can marry an animal? And then what,adults marry children,then the Governments allow arranged marriages. Excuse me but im sticking my head back in the sand,i cant bear to watch!

Answer 7

Regardless of all other complications that may be brought forth and arguments, I absolutely DO NOT agree with gay adoption.

Being gay is wasting your seeds on a rock. Why do not they have their own children the natural way since they are capable of it? Why do they crowd normal people in every aspect of life? Any one who does not think that gay parents do not, for being gay, influence the child in any way is naive.

People, stop pretending being civilized, sophisticated.. bla..bla. Homosexuality is wrong. It is against every law in the book, and I do not mean here holy books as I do not care about religions. I mean the holy book of nature; laws of survival of the species, etc.

I know, my words are falling on deaf ears and dumb brains, but I do not care.

Answer 8

I do. I mean maybe it is because i have a big heart but you can't just not let 2 guys adopt a kid. They could be wonderful parents and if so, they could raise the child to understand and also choose who they want to be and not think they have to like the same sex too. It all depends on how good of people they are i guess.

Answer 9

No only if they adopt gay children. It would have a negative effect on the child, too many straight couples have to jump through too many hoops as it is. Gay is not normal by the way.

Answer 10

NO, I do not. I think if they really wanted children, love children, then they would have a spouse, not a partner, and make one of their own. I know being around gay, they are very strong into turning a straight person into their own life style.