If all the doom and gloom is just liberal hype, then why was there only ONE HOLE in the Pentagon on 9/11?

Question

Seriously, just answer that one question. There was a fuselage and two 12,000 pound engines, all traveling at over 250mph, conservatively. There should be THREE HOLES, not one. Just explain that. PLEASE HELP ME UNDERSTAND ALL THIS INSANITY.

And if you have a logical explanation for the above, feel free to explain why Building 7 of the World Trade Center complex fell in it's footprint. It was not hit by a plane. Or, if you are going to tell us it was a controlled demolition as Silversteen claimed, how did he get the permits to BLOW A BUILDING UP in the middle of a terrorist attack in the middle of New York City in 8 hours time? I'd just like to know these things so I can understand what is going on here.

Answer 1

I have an explanation!

No 757-200 that weighs 100 tons, is as long as 1/2 a football field and almost as wide as one hit the pentagon! All the FBI has to do is release 1 picture! They can't! I can't imagine there not being 1 single photograph, video in the most secure building in the world that shows an aircraft impossible to miss! Nor one civilian photograpgh, though we have ton's of them striking the trades!

That hole was made by a cruise missle!

Answer 2

There's really no explanation that will make you happy, because you're hoping to somehow feel better about an incident that showed just how vulnerable we are to a well-planned scheme that was blessed with some luck. They outsmarted us. It was an exceptionally successful attack, militarily brilliant in much the same way that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was.

From a strategic standpoint, both were dumb, but that's another matter.

The airplane made one hole because airplanes in real life don't make airplane-shaped holes of the sort that Wile E Coyote does in the wall of a canyon. The engines are quite close to the body of the airplane.

As for WTC #7, our technical experience with fires in very tall modern buildings under incendiary attack is approximately zero. There is therefore no theoretical work--and that includes, especially, computer simulations--that can successfully challenge the best accounts of witnesses.

You'll have to live with the uncomfortable conclusions along with everyone else.

Answer 3

i ask your self why the obamabots nonetheless think of that Bush is the reason for obama's lawlessness? obama is the only which promised he might restoration all of Bush's matters. i've got no longer heard of one promise obama has saved, incredibly those approximately no intelligence amassing on human beings, being extra clean and not letting any of the alphabet companies overstep the rule of regulation. The NSA is an employer whose contributors could take an oath of fidelity and integrity in basic terms like all different government expert or provider individual. the 1st time they wiretapped without warrant then lied approximately it they committed a extreme crime against the form and the yank human beings. Who needs extra effective than that to work out some heads roll?

Answer 4

What exactly is it about you people and your conspiracy theories?? With so much hate for President Bush by the liberal media and the democrats why isnt all of this making headlines?? They print secret intelligance info to the world, they leak all kinds of stuff into the press but they would let something like this go?? Get real. Oh and building 7 I watched fall, it fell after being damaged by the towers.

Answer 5

Obviously there was a conspiricy; one person didn't fly all those planes and crash them.
So who was involved in the conspiricy?
If it was 'ol ben and al-queda, THEY certainly managed to keep it a secret, is it that had to accept that a small rouge element in our gov't, maybe in conjunction with the Isreali's, or maybe even with bin hisself could plan it and keep it a secret?
After all, bin is an ex-employee of papabush.
In fact, papabush funded bin and al-queda, US taxpayer dollars helped build the al-queda terrorist camps in Afganistan, back when they were fighting the Russians.
Whoever was responsible, jr. got everything he wanted, it was like a dream come true for him.
His daddy's old buddies at the cia (papa used to head the cia) got mucho $$$'s out of the deal too.

Answer 6

You are in dire need of reading the explanations of Popular Mechanics. Or are you one of those cooks who think that even it is in the pocket of Bush?
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/index.html

Answer 7

Ah yes. The ol' three hole conspiracy.

Answer 8

LOL.....so you all got done with the man in the grass (JFK) and majic bullet theory....and moving on to the big one....oh yeah...lol

Answer 9

DUDE YOU'RE 5 YEARS TOO LATE. THE CONSPIRACY CRAP IS BORING . GET A GIRL FRIEND.

Answer 10

MAGIC!!!!!!!!!