the honest truth is the democrats which i happen to be one, like to shovel out crap and blame it on the replublican bush campaign, the truth is we were just as high in crap when clinton took over. really the past 15 years or so. the US hasent done much we still fight over the same stupid crap like abortion, gays and healthcare. and we make those 3 issues what everyone votes for there candidate for.
and no Bush hasent done much wrong, honestly invading iraq was needed. and its the war that is why the stock market is doing so good after the technology crash. but its those troops being killed that get people to blame him.
But Americans need to consider what if it was a war that had 30,000 americans killed. before saddam was even captured the properganda would have been all different.
2007-02-16 15:06:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shane S 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because he has been in charge since January 2001 and up until January of this year, the republicans have controlled all of the other branches of government as well. I am amused by the fact that in spite of all this, Bush and his people can still manage to blame democrats for everything that goes wrong with a straight face.
2007-02-16 16:09:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tom C 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The most ridiculous Bush Bashing happened during Hurricane Katrina.
Although the Governor of Louisiana did next to nothing, and Ray "Chocolate City" Nagin was out boozing the night before, they blamed Bush.
How about blaming the people who were too lazy to leave town as instructed. When people use the argument that they couldn't afford to take the bus out of town, I just cringe. These same people probably had enough money to buy a six pack of Colt 45 Malt Liquor the night before, but couldn't scrape up $5 for a bus ticket?
How about Ray Nagin, the mayor? He is the one who is supposed to be on the front lines, he has all the local resources. He could have used all the school buses to transport people out of town for free. He is supposed to inform the governor of the situation, and then request aid. No one did anything until the crisis was a huge crisis.
2007-02-16 14:59:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am reminded of the old saying Harry Truman used to adhere to: The Buck Stops Here.
As President, Bush has the benefit of being "the Decider", of being the man in charge, and that means he bears the responsibility as well. That's the trade-off for having the authority.
Now, there are things I won't blame Bush for. He's not responsible for male pattern baldness. He's not responsible for the latest movie by Uwe Boll. But he is responsible for getting us into a foolish war of choice in Iraq.
2007-02-16 15:08:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by bdunn91 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
You might be right, Bush isn't responsible for everything, just the Entire Free World. The people who pull Bush's strings are responsible for most of the truly evil things Bush takes the blame for. Such is the price of being the worlds most powerful figurehead.
2007-02-16 15:03:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by blogbaba 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
The individuals that blame Bush for each little thing are restricted to the few, who've no self-worth, low IQ, and intensely short ideas. seems they pick it both options. First he lied about WMD's besides the actual shown reality that this modification right into a reality 16 years previous to his taking the helm from the fool that allowed 3000 Marines to be killed, a deliver and military workers be killed and did no longer something about it. i might want to like it if a minimum of one of you may want to tell me which concepts you pick to trust, they do or they do no longer have the opt to construct the bomb? And why now?
2016-10-17 07:35:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not everyone blames everything on Bush.
Some, in fact don't blame Bush for anything and continue to support him.
Bush is becoming a symbol of incompetence or greed to a growing majority of the population.
Everyone doesn't blame everything on him. You still support him, don't you?
2007-02-16 15:10:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Blaming Bush is the easiest thing to do, thats why people do it. Clearly everything is not his fault, and people just show their lack of intelligence by blaming him for everything.
2007-02-16 15:02:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I AGREE 100% with you.That's a big true.Bush is the best president that the USA already had.He is smart,wise,a man with guts.Bush is the man that we need in the white house,he studied in Harvard and he is a successful business man.People who blame Bush are envious of him and they feel envy about Bush's success.They don't understand that A GREAT LEADER MAKE DECISIONS THAT ARE CORRECT NOT TO PLEASE A GROUP OF PEOPLE.I admire Bush,people that blame Bush are blind and they don't want to see the true.GOD BLESS BUSH,GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!!BUSH IS THE PRESIDENT,THE BOSS AND HE IS THE ONE IN POWER IT DOESN'T MATTER IF PEOPLE LIKE IT OR NOT.
2007-02-16 15:04:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by The Apostle 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Especially when it should be blamed on Bill Clinton.....maybe if he would have done something during his administration, (outside of getting blow jobs in his office) maybe none of this would have happened.
In early 2002, Bill Clinton was speaking at a function in New York, he was asked a question about capturing Osama Bin Laden, when he replied. "The country of Sudan had him captured during my term and asked if they could turn him over to us, I refused based on the fact that the US didnt have a charge against him for which we should hold him on." I guess he forgot about the first attack on the WTC. Clinton is the one that should be blamed.
2007-02-16 14:59:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Johnny Conservative 5
·
1⤊
1⤋