English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What I mean by that is that nowadays the Titles are being used to promote and push those who Vince wants to push and promote more than those that actually deserve to have the Titles. I mean, the only thing that Lashley had to do to get the ECW Title (even though he doesn't have an extreme bone in his body) was be big and Vince hopped at the chance to have another roided-up champion. Let's not forget the fact that the competion in the Championships has become crap and a total waste of time to even watch. How do you ask? It is because during the whole 2006 year for all three championships there were only ten or so wrestlers who either was the champion or the challenger the enitre year! That is actually either less or even to the amount it used to be just for the WWE Championship back in the 90's and early 2000, and ficle fans say because these wrestlers are the only ones that deserve the titles? If you actually think that you havent been watching wrestling very long or you are ignorant.

2007-02-16 14:02:43 · 7 answers · asked by Thomas C 4 in Sports Wrestling

Now lets get to the fact that the WWE has seemed to go back and time and decide that they will only let a handful of people holding the Titles and have them hold them multiple times, thus making the show predictable and lack any competiveness and intensity. Do you actually think that Triple H (a.k.a. "The Biggest Suck Up Ever in Wrestling History") won't get the WWE Championship emmediately after he returns making him a ridiculous 11 time champion, and then he will hold it for about 3 or 4 months before either Cena, Roidtista, Lashley, or Shawn Michaels takes it from him? The WWE has become so predictable that someone who has watched wrestling for more than 10 years can already have a good guess as to who is going to face whom next Wrestlemania when the current Wrestlemania hasn't even happened yet!

2007-02-16 14:09:10 · update #1

Also, lets talk about the fact that the WWE seems incapable of thinking outside the box and saying, "Hmm, there is CM Punk. He is talented in wrestling, he has charisma, he has style, he can carry a match, why don't we make him champion?" No! They say, "Oh, there is Lashley. He is a big guy that is well over 300 pounds but is slow, less mobile, has no mic skills, and only has a handfull of moves. Hmm. Oh the hell with it! Give him the Title because we got a reputation to uphold that if you aren't either tall, overweight, or roided-up there isn't a snowballs chance in hell you will ever win the title unless the fans are so behind you that no matter what we do to say otherwise they want him as champion. Wait what about his ability to hold a match? Oh that, we'll just tell the wrestlers he is wrestling against that they better job for him or the won't go anywhere in the WWE and that will solve the problem." I guarnuntee you that is the kind of discussion going on in the WWE writing room.

2007-02-16 14:16:46 · update #2

Let's not also forget that they think that it is a good idea to continue to give someone numerous Title reighns. I don't like Triple H, and I never will, but he is talented and deserved to have the title a couple of times, but nobody, and I mean nobody deserves to hold a title more than eight times, nobody is that good, except maybe Bret Hart. One of the reasons Ric Flair, Hulk Hogan, and Sting have held the titles so much is because the companies they worked for needed them to be champions because they were trying to draw people in to their shows. Wrestling doesn't have that problem now so nobody should be a champion any more than 8 times, it shouldn't happen.

2007-02-16 14:26:42 · update #3

I used to think it might be true, but now I know it's true, and that is that the only time the WWE is really great is when it has competition because when that happens Vince stops being controlling and thinking he knows what we want to see and just lets the wrestlers be themselves, that is why Steve Austin and The Rock did so well. That is why I am rooting for TNA and WSX, so that the WWE will get off their *** and relise that they aren't as in touch with the fans as they think they are. What do you think?

2007-02-16 14:44:32 · update #4

7 answers

I totally agree with you. Today it is too commercialized. Seems that everything they do is directed toward the next "big event" on pay-per-view or something. I bet Vince's old man is turning over in his grave to see things run this way. But, then again, Vince is a millionaire now, so what the heck does he care about what the fans think? He doesn't. I don't even bother to watch it any more. Even though John Cena lives in the next town from me.

2007-02-16 14:21:17 · answer #1 · answered by knownothing 4 · 1 0

Finally words of wisdom. It is so predictable its not even fun anymore. I mean when they compete for the title the opposition isn't even great. I mean come on Edge? No offense but he wasn't even that great and i come back to watch wrestling after awhile and here he is the champ. WTF? The only match which is even a decent contention is Undertaker vs Batista and everyone knows taker is going to win so he'll have a perfect record.

2007-02-16 17:05:37 · answer #2 · answered by fcrnnngbck25 2 · 0 1

UOUR A SMART MAN I AGREE 100% its one champ all year cena is my fav off all time but it gets a litttle boring watchig him always have a title and wins evrey match HELL he has 2 hole belts now but aks like it nothing

2007-02-16 14:21:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

-Hardcore Holly
-Rob Van Dam
-CM Punk
-Sabu
-Test
-Edge
-Ric Flair
-Kane
-Big Show
-Batista
-Booker T
-John Cena
-Ken Kennedy
-Kurt Angle
-Rey Mysterio
-JBL
-Randy Orton
-Paul LeVesque(Triple H)
-Mark Henry
-Undertaker
-Umaga

All got to be in world title matches.

2007-02-16 14:20:24 · answer #4 · answered by Harry A 6 · 0 1

there are way to many titles...and vinces head is way to swelled...bigger ego than hmmm....maybe even the Donald

2007-02-16 14:10:44 · answer #5 · answered by Mr. Smoothie, aka Mr. SmartAss 6 · 1 0

i agree with u 100...%percent. hey, dude thats exactly what I was thinking

2007-02-16 14:09:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i couldn't have said it better myself.

2007-02-17 21:09:26 · answer #7 · answered by da realest 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers