... it could be covert operations to try to somewhat destabalize iran before an impending attack ..... its not unthinkable ... we have documented proof cia has performed covert operations in iran in the past to foster regime change ...
2007-02-16 12:27:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
If you want to pay your Kaffir tax, or get your hands and feet chopped off, or have your family sold into slavery, or be forced to worship a different religion, don't read this.
It has been suggested that we should follow the policy of Gandhi to free our planet from terrorism. I think such a policy would only lead to coerced subjugation of the rest of the world, and slavery, and abject misery for billions.
Gandhi was up against a ruling power that was basically beneficial--that's why the British Empire had spread so far with so little resource expenditure. Perhaps the colonial British had a stick stuck in a stinky place, but they weren't crazy, homocidal fanatics, and eventually adjusted to the changing world.
Check this out--
A Proposed Charter of Muslim Understanding
By Sam Solomon
Foreword by Gerard Batten
UK Independence Party
Member of the European Parliament for London
December 2006
Article 9
We the signatories request all Islamic institutions and all of its
associates, affiliations and outlets in co-operation with the
signatories to this Charter:
a) To discard all texts that discriminate with impunity against
Christians and Jews by describing them as Kaffirs,
apostates, polytheists, the children of apes, and swine, and
prohibit any inciting, insulting, and all discriminatory
references based on their religion
b) To abandon the practice of Takffir (infidel) against
anybody, be that a Muslim or a non-Muslim. (Once a
Muslim leader declares anyone as such, it is for the faithful
ones to see that person eliminated.)
c) To prohibit and abolish the practice of Takkiya (Islamic
doctrine of legitimate lying and deception of others) to
advance the cause of Muslims and Islam.
This insulting, inciting, discrimination, and deception is not to be
upheld or practised.
Here is a British man trying to get the violent, fundamentalist Islamanazis to moderate their self-destructive behaviors, and they aren't having any of it. What Mr. Solomon still hasn't accepted is that FANATICS of ANY flavor CANNOT be negotiated with--they are ideologically incapable of adjustment to a changing world--that's what makes them fanatics! THEY WILL NEVER STOP! They are locked into their course of action. Islamunists kill people who try to convert to another religion and philosophy.
Not ONE Islamic nation's government supports this peace proposal!! They don't want it. They want world homogeneity, as defined by them, and brought about by reprehensible actions in the name of 'religion'. This is EVIL!
Unfortunately, there aren't too many EFFECTIVE ways to deal with homocidal fanatics. Why waste time, money and lives on INEFFECTIVE appeasment? It just delays the day of Jihad.
Islamic terrorists KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE! Now, I love peace and freedom as much as the next guy. But sometimes it's necessary to pull our heads out of our 'idealss', and put foot to hump for all mankind.
PLEASE, think up a different solution that includes my life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, without my living in constant fear of a terrorist act killing or maiming my little girls. Even if it costs a little more money than nuking the evil 'tards that want to violently overthrow everything I believe in, if it will save other human life, I'll agree to it. Just remember, it MUST be EFFECTIVE. Also, remember that Palestinian Islamanazis won't even recognize Israel as a legitimate government. They support the extermination of all Israeli Jews, and actively practice Jihad. So, once again, tell me how to take care of this problem.
2007-02-20 06:52:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dorothy and Toto 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are not mean, you have sense enough to know that Iran is terrorist and are a threat to not only the US but many others. Iran needs to be dealt with, but with stronger actions.
2007-02-16 12:30:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by m c 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I feel sorry for them. Terrorists always kill the innocent and rarely the guilty.
2007-02-16 12:29:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That whole area is a powder keg waiting for a match. I see that the US is being blamed for being behind the attacks. We sure are a busy country aren't we.
2007-02-16 12:35:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Although U.S. participation in these attacks is possible, I doubt that President Bush would risk being that involved at this point.
2007-02-16 12:32:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by ©2009 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
It should continue. Till they stop it in Iraq. What goes around comes around.
2007-02-16 13:18:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by us citizen 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The U.S. and it's allied forces should wipe them off the map!
2007-02-16 12:34:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by wolfcity57 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
You always hate to see innocent people die.
http://www.conservativeworld.us/
2007-02-16 12:28:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by JASON A 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why should we feel sorry for them....
I don't feel sorry for a country that is threatening
me and my lifestyle.....
2007-02-16 12:28:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by TRUE GRIT 5
·
1⤊
1⤋