English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

1. President Bush
2. Dick Cheney
3. Condoleezza Rice
4. Tony Snow

2007-02-16 12:03:15 · answer #1 · answered by na n 3 · 5 5

Far and away the biggest threat to homeland security is the corporate destruction of the American industrial base. Media and other right wing sources distract the American public from the true threat to our Country by playing up the aspect of job losses. Bias against "lazy, over paid, Union represented" people losing their jobs is used to mask the truth. That truth is outsourcing and the movement of corporate industry to lower wage areas outside the United States is destroying our Country. It is a true attack on America from the European Union, China and other economic competitors, done indirectly and at gradual pace so as not to alert the public to the severity of the threat.

Without a strong economic industrial base a modern Country cannot equip it's military or support it's people. Without politicians who understand this threat and move to protect the United States of America's remaining industry, we as a nation are doomed. It is not the death of the Middle Class we are talking about here, it is the death of our Nation. Our leaders must stop being corporate puppets of big business and govern the people of this country, or we are all lost save the ultra rich elite.

2007-02-23 22:05:09 · answer #2 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 0 1

1. Homeland Security.

2007-02-16 20:12:33 · answer #3 · answered by Don M 7 · 4 1

Inadequate border patrolling including shore patrols, Inadequate shipping patrols on what is being shipped into the country. Not enough checking on baggage being put onto airplanes. Not enough security service personnel to find those supplying forged documents for illegals & checking on those already in the country from the middle east. Not just Latinos, others from countries that are our sworn enemies.
This all strictly pretains to national security, as was the question asked.

2007-02-16 20:19:24 · answer #4 · answered by geegee 6 · 2 0

Check this out--

A Proposed Charter of Muslim Understanding
By Sam Solomon
Foreword by Gerard Batten
UK Independence Party
Member of the European Parliament for London
December 2006

Article 9

We the signatories request all Islamic institutions and all of its
associates, affiliations and outlets in co-operation with the
signatories to this Charter:

a) To discard all texts that discriminate with impunity against
Christians and Jews by describing them as Kaffirs,
apostates, polytheists, the children of apes, and swine, and
prohibit any inciting, insulting, and all discriminatory
references based on their religion

b) To abandon the practice of Takffir (infidel) against
anybody, be that a Muslim or a non-Muslim. (Once a
Muslim leader declares anyone as such, it is for the faithful
ones to see that person eliminated.)

c) To prohibit and abolish the practice of Takkiya (Islamic
doctrine of legitimate lying and deception of others) to
advance the cause of Muslims and Islam.

This insulting, inciting, discrimination, and deception is not to be
upheld or practised.


Here is a British man trying to get the violent, fundamentalist Islamanazis to moderate their self-destructive behaviors, and they aren't having any of it. What Mr. Solomon still hasn't accepted is that FANATICS of ANY flavor CANNOT be negotiated with--they are ideologically incapable of adjustment to a changing world--that's what makes them fanatics! THEY WILL NEVER STOP! They are locked into their course of action. Islamunists kill people who try to convert to another religion and philosophy.

Not ONE Islamic nation's government supports this peace proposal!! They don't want it. They want world homogeneity, as defined by them, and brought about by reprehensible actions in the name of 'religion'. This is EVIL!

Unfortunately, there aren't too many EFFECTIVE ways to deal with homocidal fanatics. Why waste time, money and lives on INEFFECTIVE appeasment? It just delays the day of Jihad.

Islamic terrorists KILL INNOCENT PEOPLE! Now, I love peace and freedom as much as the next guy. But sometimes it's necessary to pull our heads out of our 'idealss', and put foot to hump for all mankind.

PLEASE, think up a different solution that includes my life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, without my living in constant fear of a terrorist act killing or maiming my little girls. Even if it costs a little more money than nuking the evil 'tards that want to violently overthrow everything I believe in, if it will save other human life, I'll agree to it. Just remember, it MUST be EFFECTIVE. Also, remember that Palestinian Islamanazis won't even recognize Israel as a legitimate government. They support the extermination of all Israeli Jews, and actively practice Jihad. So, once again, tell me how to take care of this problem.

2007-02-20 14:56:50 · answer #5 · answered by Dorothy and Toto 5 · 1 0

#1 This administration
#2 A comprehnsive plan to secure gaps in our borders that terrorists and/or wmds can be sneaked through undetected
#3 Not engaging the true target, while we waste too much time policing IRAQ.
#4 A non existent foreign policy that would alleviate our efforts elsewhere and free up more troops to hunt down our true target, that would gain support from potential new allies.

2007-02-16 20:04:20 · answer #6 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 3 1

Nancy Pelosi

2007-02-16 20:04:37 · answer #7 · answered by MANDY 2 · 1 1

It's allies hypocrisy in Iran and IRAQ! Less inner democracy! Economic and poverty issues. Social security issues!

2007-02-22 07:16:34 · answer #8 · answered by filip 4 · 1 0

Terrorists, Liberals who want Socialism instead of capitalism, Conservatives who want Fascism or a Theocracy instead of Capitalism.

2007-02-24 04:56:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Arrogant Right Wing Conservatives blinded by Religion

2007-02-16 20:20:10 · answer #10 · answered by pixel shREdder 3 · 3 2

Bush. Cheney. Our warmongering politicians. Neo Cons who don't know what they are doing. Stirring up stuff in Iran and the rest of the world which will create more terrorists. Funding Israel so they can bomb their neighbors (which is why the middle east is a 'problem' to begin with).

2007-02-16 20:05:24 · answer #11 · answered by ANSWER MY QUESTION!! 6 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers