English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

In the nation of Iraq this past decade alone, up to 2 million Iraqi citizens (most of them children) have needlessly perished due largely to the genocidal economic, political and military sanctions imposed upon them by the United States after the Gulf War.

http://www.geocities.com/devilstair4/devil.html

2007-02-16 12:19:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i am so against all of the things that bush is doing. there is no ligitimate reason for any of this to have started in the first place. if we would have went after the person responsible for 9/11 like we were supposed to and not have gotten lied to and misled into believing that sadaam had anything whatsoever to do with this then america would not be where it is now. we have caught sadaam he is dead, we still have not found any weapons of mass destruction, our troops are dying more each day and we are stuck over there. how could anyone not be against this man. nothing positive has came from this war at all

2007-02-17 22:32:43 · answer #2 · answered by misseshodges 2 · 0 0

hell no, Bush is an absolute idiot that deserves the chair. He has wasted over 3000 American lives for his own personal gain along with a few other elite friends. This is an illegal war because he never had the consent of UN. Then just the other day in his speach he had the nerve to tell UN they need to send more troops to Afghanistan. Yet we need a troop surge in Iraq???? Get out of this war now and stop wasting billions of tax payer dollars that would be much better spent elsewhere like healthcare or education. So I say SUCK IT BUSH! and go to hell.

2007-02-16 11:23:02 · answer #3 · answered by don_megaWC 2 · 0 2

I'm definitely against it because Bush is just sending people into a death trap!! Too many soldiers are dying and too much money is being spent on a pointless war. Peace will never be achieved if Bush thinks that it can be achieved through war. I think he just wants to see his big head on TV like everyday. He needs to stop putting soldiers in risk... They already gave alot.

2007-02-16 11:24:46 · answer #4 · answered by Gemini 3 · 1 1

Definetly against. It will be impossible to get rid of all terrorsits in Iraq. He went there for no reason, except that there were terrosits. But that is not a reason to go to war. When he went to war with Afghanastan, that was a good reason cuz Osama Bin Laden was there and everyone supported him. However, he doesn't have a reason for this. He should definetly be stopped.

2007-02-16 11:19:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I don't really agree with all of the Iraq lies.I don't want to be lied to about us invading Iran.That will be a can of worms we will never get the lid back on.

2007-02-16 14:04:53 · answer #6 · answered by one10soldier 6 · 0 0

I am against many if not all of the ideas and actions Mr. Bush has set into action during his farce of a presidency

2007-02-16 11:43:51 · answer #7 · answered by grizzliesgurl 4 · 1 1

I am for routing out an evil despot who was running the country. We have done that. I am against our soldiers continuing to be killed for no apparent gain. I am for sending more troops to go on a massive search-and-destroy mission to get rid of the insurgents, and/or weapons beimg brought in from other countries (from Iran?). However, 21,000 extra troops is not enough. 210,000 would be more like it!

2007-02-16 11:27:00 · answer #8 · answered by Gee Wye 6 · 0 2

I myself am against what he is doing. We get ourselves in enough troble in life why do we need him to start things between a whole counrty? Life is hard enough already we don't need to worry about who is going to bomb who.I don't even know why we have a President or government for that fact.I think we could live just as crappy now as if we had no one telling us how we should live.

2007-02-16 13:25:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Im for Bush geting it right this time and not playing around now that he has fired rumsfield . now the dems need to support him but they wont and we may live to regret not finishing the job.

2007-02-17 08:06:39 · answer #10 · answered by dan m 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers