English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't mean what would people argue and disagree over over I mean what can all (meaning about 99% of)people agree about?

2007-02-16 10:50:34 · 13 answers · asked by Stan S 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

13 answers

That it's a lot better than the world we are living in now.

2007-02-16 10:54:46 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I think that's impossible. What seems right to someone will be the complete opposite to someone else's opinion. Like, one person said that it would be a warless world, well what if a world full of war is exactly what someone else wants??? I think for a perfect Earth to be real, it would have to die out and start all over again. There would have to be a leader and everyone else would have to be completely clueless. they would have to have no idea about anything, and that one leader would have to have more experience with everything and tell them that where they are is the perfect place to live, that who they are are perfect human beings, and other thoughts like that. they'd jsut pretty much have to get breainwashed. i don't know if you get me, i know exactly what i mean, but i can't quite say it without writing like 5 pages.

2007-02-16 11:08:50 · answer #2 · answered by betterthanchocolate 1 · 1 0

I think everyone agrees that a person in the earthly paradise will never be hungry. Whether their hunger is satiated with food that's available for free and for everyone or you are fulfilled by some sort of divine supplement, people do not want to be hungry ^^

2007-02-16 10:56:20 · answer #3 · answered by Le Petit Fleur 3 · 1 0

I'd go for Coleridge's view of Xanadu as in his poem "Kubla Khan" dining on honeydew and drinking the milk of paradise.

Where Alph, the sacred river, ran
Through caverns measureless to man
Down to a sunless sea.
So twice five miles of fertile ground
With walls and towers were girdled round :
And there were gardens bright with sinuous rills,
Where blossomed many an incense-bearing tree ;
And here were forests ancient as the hills,
Enfolding sunny spots of greenery.

2007-02-16 10:58:26 · answer #4 · answered by the_lipsiot 7 · 0 0

Making Earthly Paradises is my business fro 35 years ,i make integrated gardens that are compact and diverse
a pagan concept working with the forces of Nature

Paradise is here if you work hard for it ,and so is hell and you dont have to die to end up in either
where you go is up to you
i am a Permaculture Consultant for the department of Ecology for the regional government in Guerrero Mexico
http://spaces.msn.com/byderule

Permaculture means permanent agriculture
a concept put forward by Bill Mollisson in the 60`s
which is a complete hand book for environmental design.
for those who seek an ambiotic relationship with our planet
With practical solutions for energy systems ,infratructure ,housing,
animal shelter ,water systems and sustainable agricultural practises.
With the world and it`s history as it`s source
From the chinampas of Mexico to the teraced gardens of the Andes.
From the dessert whadis to the steppes of Russia.
Covering all climatic conditions temporal, dessert, humid and dry tropics.
with chapters on soil ,Water harvesting and land design,
Earth working ,Spirals in nature,Trees and water ,utilising energy flows,
Strategy for an alternative nation

this book also has many gardening tips,bio-gas,companion planting and ideas for structures ,how to cool down houses in hot climates ,how to warm up houses in cold climates with out using technology but rather by design.

always aiming at autosuficiency and sustainability .
this can all be found in the designers manual by Bill Mollisson,
tagariadmin@southcom.com.au

2007-02-16 11:10:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

If there were a common agreement, we'd have it here now.

No, deep down, the desires of the population are diverse enough to lead to tribism, nationalism, war, and self-imposed segregation. If there were a significant common thread, we wouldn't be experiencing the human traits we see now.

2007-02-16 11:08:37 · answer #6 · answered by Houston, we have a problem 7 · 0 0

Personal pain and/or disappointment would be lower, maybe 5th or 6th, on everyone's list of daily priorities. The popularity of violence/war as a way of solving problems would even be lower on that same list.

I personally think we would still have bad weather and stuff like earthquakes, but we would deal with these differently.

2007-02-16 11:04:29 · answer #7 · answered by clophad 2 · 0 0

It will be a place without war, without discrimination, where justice reigns and humanity functions like one great family. This is the vision of Baha'u'llah, a vision that will eventually come to fruition.

2007-02-16 11:01:13 · answer #8 · answered by darth_maul_8065 5 · 0 0

If you can find one thing on which every person agrees, you will have accomplished something no one else has ever been able to do. Good luck with it.

2007-02-16 10:57:07 · answer #9 · answered by Kord, the Seeker 2 · 0 0

I don't know, and neither does anyone else, because nobody has asked 99% of people. Or if they have, they haven't published their findings.

2007-02-16 13:46:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers