English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

24 answers

i am not gay... but i believe that they should be allow to marry.. i mean they already have all the head aches of a realionship... when they move in with each other... why on earth should we care if they marry... what right do we have to tell them what they can and can not do..if they are wrong when they die god will tell them.. we should just leave them be.. let them marry and we are not god..so who are we to judge

2007-02-16 11:55:50 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

Well, I'm gay. And Belgian. And in a 'gay (lesbian) marriage'. Since about 3 1/2 years in Belgium a same-sex marriage is possible. So after being a couple for 17 years, we got married then.
A normal, legal marriage that is. In my country religious marriage and legal marriage always have been separate things. And to me, that's how it should be.
A marriage is a legal contract between two partners. Who cares what sex partners are? Why shouldn't gay people have the same legal rights in protecting their partner/children legally? Nobody will get harmed by that. Even the children raised in a gay union will benefit. Frequently it's the only parents they've ever known. That can be a happy or unhappy, a wanted or unwanted thing, but it's reality At least they won't be taken away from the only home/parent they know, of one of the partners dies, and get lost into child-care...
America, get religion out of your legal system. It's the only way to rationally consider items like this....

2007-02-16 19:22:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If gays really want the hastle of marriage, I say let them have it. Personally, I would never marry my partner. Tax wise you are much better off if you dont. After all, getting a legal permit that acts as a binding contract to do something that is spiritual and natural seems contrary to me. I am supprized that straight people get married any more. If it were not for the morality that religion dumps on most of us I dont think they would.

Was straight, am gay, now divorced.

2007-02-16 19:42:33 · answer #3 · answered by Daniel M 4 · 2 0

Yes. I'm all in favor of civil marriage for anyone and leave the religous marriage stuff to the various religons without governmental involvement.

2007-02-16 18:54:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Definately

2007-02-16 21:52:30 · answer #5 · answered by 17-4serendipity 3 · 1 1

Yes it should. But marriage is not just a piece of paper. It's a great commitment to be able to make to someone that you love.

2007-02-16 18:53:47 · answer #6 · answered by qdeezy 3 · 1 1

Yes

2007-02-16 19:35:35 · answer #7 · answered by gitsliveon24 5 · 4 1

Of course! Marriage is just a piece of paper anyway.

2007-02-16 18:51:48 · answer #8 · answered by Rapunzel XVIII 5 · 0 2

Of course! That's like us asking 50 years ago if blacks and whites should be allowed to get married!

2007-02-16 19:30:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Yes! The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't love heterosexuals.

2007-02-16 18:58:37 · answer #10 · answered by pissed off with abuse, goodbye! 2 · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers