2007-02-16 10:17:48 · 19 answers · asked by some black dude with no life 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
But if you're an acessory/accomplice to/in a crime you get charged with the crime so...(means you're just as guilty as the killer or it's like you did it yourself). He's still responsible in that case?
2007-02-16 10:31:53 · update #1
Hakuna Matata
http://youtube.com/watch?v=B6ixCtNmqL4
2007-02-16 11:04:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Two different premises in your question;
(1) You have committed criminal assault, period, and it could also be considered a hate crime in certain situations.
(2) The President had the authorization of practically the entire congress to go to war.............following 9-11.
2007-02-16 10:44:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why do muslims in the middle eastern nations get cheered and honored for beheading Christians and Jews, and people around the world think it is an act of MURDERING THUGS not humans who do those things?
2007-02-16 10:20:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Everyone should get in trouble for hurting another regardless of race or religion. Where Bush is concerned I think he's a blood thirsty bigot.
2007-02-16 10:20:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well that's all because Bush has international law on his side. You don't.
Simple as that. Anyway Beating anyone up is assault no matter who they are or their beliefs. Tolerance only works with compassion.
In other words don't beat nobody. It's wrong dude, just plain wrong.
2007-02-16 10:22:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because the ''moslems in this country'' are not actively engaged in combat with our troops. Did you really have to be told that?
2007-02-16 10:20:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because governments have the only legal authority to use violence. An economist would call that their 'competitive edge.'
2007-02-16 10:27:00 · answer #7 · answered by mrsgavanrossem 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hes not personally killing anyone just like Saddam didnt personally kill anyone. I dont see why good christians with their excellent record on brutality and torture cant be allowed to kill muslims here like they are doing in Iraq and allowing the Israelis to do in Palestine.
2007-02-16 10:53:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush has not killed anyone.It has been said for countless years leaders do not kill people, the ones who take the orders do.
2007-02-16 10:24:02 · answer #9 · answered by bboy244 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because its war, and killing is with in the rules and boundaries of war. I know your question wasnt supposed to be literal like that, and it was more a moral, big-picture kind of question.....but thats all that is really different......'the rules of engagement'
2007-02-16 10:21:22 · answer #10 · answered by azwoman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋