Who Daniel, her son, was to be her sole heir and would receive payouts of her estate at 21 in the event of her death, (HE DIED AT 20), and Stern was in the room, and then Anna Nicole dies "mysteriously" at 39 while Stern is in the room AND NOW it's revealed that he is named as executor of her will. Coincidence or a murder/greed conspiracy? Even if he is NOT the new baby's father he is still executor of Anna Nicoles will. OPINIONS???
2007-02-16 10:10:35 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
i don't like this guy at all. it doesn't really matter now does it. the only reason we care is b/c she was a celebrity. at the end of the day she chose her own road to destruction. i hope he's not the father. the only reall loser is that innocent child. she's the loser b/c her mama didn't make better descions in life.
2007-02-16 10:25:19 · answer #1 · answered by freedom fighter 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe he is responsible in some way. At the very least, he seems like he didn't love Anna or have her best interest in mind. I think she and her son were drug addicts - Howard Stern was the pusher. The truth could be even more sinister - perhaps he masterminded some sort of lethal combination that killed both of them. The sad truth is that when you turn your life over to drugs, you also make yourself vulnerable to some really rotten people. What a truly sad ending to a sad life. I hope someone comes to the rescue of that poor baby.
2007-02-16 18:25:25 · answer #2 · answered by emily923 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Keep an eye on the post, I think you are about to find a lible suite landing on your doorstep at any moment. You have just accused somebody of being a multiple murderer.
2007-02-16 18:13:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its too much of a coincidence and the look of his face? He should be in Hannibal Rising.
2007-02-16 18:16:46 · answer #4 · answered by siaosi 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he killed them both because he wanted her money.
2007-02-16 18:24:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋