the fact that some people call liberals terrorists shows the shear lack of intelligence in some people. It really is frightening that some people are really that stupid. Or maybe it is that their hatred is at such a level that they can't think straight.
2007-02-16 10:10:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
4⤊
4⤋
I agree that if liberals were in power we would not have been attacked, because the liberals would have been on their collective knees begging the terrorist's forgiveness and asking them nicely if they promised to never attack us again we would give them massive amounts of money and even bend over, drop our trousers or hike up our dresses and let them have their way with us.
At one time Liberals actually had a spine and were willing to stand up for what was right (i.e. Harry S. Truman) and say 'DAMN THE CONSEQUENCES.....MY COUNTRY RIGHT OR WRONG!"
It was the policy of another recognized liberal, Thomas Jefferson, who was president during the Barbary Wars of 1801-1805 believed in the policy of "MILLIONS FOR DEFENSE, BUT NOT ONE CENT FOR TRIBUTE."
So as far as I am concerned liberals are terrorist sympathizers. The terrorists have repeatedly said they hope the liberals Democrats do get in power because they know they will all surrender.
2007-02-16 10:47:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by carlsharp2002 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Give it two more years. I don't think the problem is Republican or Democrats alone. I believe they are both from their own angles accomplishing the ease for terrorists to attack someday. Bush leaves the border open, the liberals by their own admission want to treat the terrorists like friends. Everything that both parties are doing is going to blow up in our faces. I predict within the next 5 years.
Open your eyes
Read Michael Savages The Enemy Within
he doesn't take sides but tells the wrong on both
2007-02-16 10:13:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by sapphire_630 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Attacking the country doesn't have to be with bombs, jets, or IED's. Disapproving of internal measures like the Patriot Act is a roundabout way of weakening the country from within without firing a shot.
2007-02-16 10:16:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm a centerist. From my perspective, you don't need to. The conservatives are in their own circular firing squad. They can't wait to throw each other under the bus. Who needs liberal terrorists when we have Carl Rove's math and Bill O'Reilly's news.
You'll do just fine in the next six to ten years. Those of us in the middle will probably see to it.
2007-02-16 10:12:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Goofy Foot 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Truth Seeker you intellectually lacking Liberal freak, can you not comprehend the direct concept? Liberals are NOT terrorists they are more sympathetic to them than "true" Conservatives. They are deteriorating our country's moral roots as indicated by our piece of s.hit society today.
2007-02-16 10:13:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by ☠Skull Cleaner☠ 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
most know it's silly, but it's all part of the game to them... they think it will get them votes... that someone may actually believe it...
they said the same things last November... and it clearly did wonders for their campaigns... hahaha...
no one is buying it anymore... and everyone is getting tired of hearing the same tired propaganda repeated...
2007-02-16 10:30:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought that's what they were doing. Having a "leaflet" war.
http://library.georgetown.edu/dept/speccoll/fl/f134%7D4.htm
2007-02-16 10:15:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because you are insidious!
Here, let me help you out.
Insidious-
developing in a very gradual, stealthy manner, with the intent of causing damage, intending to entrap, treacherous.
Retrieved from "http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/insidious"
2007-02-16 10:13:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Silly person everyone knows libs don't own bombs or guns.
we let the cons destroy it for us.
don't make me stop this car and come back there!
2007-02-16 10:18:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋