CIRCUMCISE or NOT ?
2007-02-16 09:10:46 · 29 answers · asked by ♥ 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Does either one improve performance?
2007-02-16 09:13:29 · answer #1 · answered by §чﺀﺀчβчﻯ†a 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I find that there really isn't much difference between circumcised or not as long as it's hard. It's just a little extra work for the women. But I prefer circumcised just because it looks a little funny, almost as if it has a hoodie on or something when it's uncircumcised. And also I feel like there is an inconsistancy in size when it's uncircumcised. My theory is with all that extra skin it's able to get bigger when hard. I like either or & some guys are very self-conscious if there are uncircumcised because most women are used to seeing it circumcised. The only real difference is for the women when they give head. It's just extra work since in order for them to get pleasure you have to kind of pull the foreskin back a little.
2007-02-16 17:17:49 · answer #2 · answered by Kelly 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
circumcise is better
2007-02-23 15:10:52 · answer #3 · answered by Baby Doll 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
only been with circumcised....i think i will stick with that.
2007-02-22 21:32:08 · answer #4 · answered by Just Tryin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Circumsized man, I work in hospitals and see what its like for guys to not be able to get their foreskin pulled back over their penis... so yeah, less skin is good
2007-02-23 20:33:27 · answer #5 · answered by beach_chica02 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im circumcised and I never had any complaints.
2007-02-16 17:14:23 · answer #6 · answered by Richard J 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
circumcised
2007-02-16 17:13:27 · answer #7 · answered by broadwaynights87 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes definately.
2007-02-16 17:22:59 · answer #8 · answered by Extra Blue Note 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I've had both and I prefer circumcised, especially when doing oral.
2007-02-16 17:14:10 · answer #9 · answered by Brown eyed girl 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
CIRCUMCISE
2007-02-22 23:50:26 · answer #10 · answered by chrisandlindsayjohnston 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋