English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He wants to visit with our children ages 11 and under. The law will allow him because he is the biological father.

This law in California is messed. I feel as he is getting awarded.
I have been sacrificing my heart for my children, and our counseling sessions have really helped. The law says is better that the children have a fatherly influence.

The declaration he submitted thur the court is so twisted and distorted with more than half lies. That shows to me that if he is that twisted and manipulating, that he is dangerous.

He works thur manipulation.

Is there anyway that I can win this case?I do not want my children with him.

Can the law make an exception, not only that but the law is wrong!

2007-02-16 09:04:05 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

6 answers

NEXT TIME YOU VOTE REMEMBER NANCY PELOSI IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT.

2007-02-16 09:11:52 · answer #1 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 0 2

without understanding any of the information, there is no thanks to make an recommended determination. the important question I easily have isn't any matter if he abused his personal little ones. if that's the case, then there is no way he must have any contact with them till the little ones are the right age to guard themselves and make up their personal minds in a mature way. If no longer, then what precisely did he do? As someone said, some registered offenders particularly ought to no longer be on the registry. a best social gathering is a 19 365 days-old who had "consensual" sex at the same time with his 16 365 days-old lady friend, were given charged with statutory rape, and could develop right into a registered sex criminal. This replaced into no longer what the registry replaced into meant to do. i recognize this has occurred, because I artwork heavily with holding amenities and the District felony professional in my county. So, assuming that his crime replaced right into a valid abuse crime, yet he did not abuse his personal little ones. Then, i might want to assert, searching on the situations, he might want to likely be allowed supervised visits at the same time with his little ones, with the supervision offered by technique of someone or company that each and every one activities agree upon. No in one day visits. I also opt to hearken to what the little ones want. Do they omit their father? Do they opt to work out him? Does he have a relationship or bond with them? All of those aspects ought to come into play.

2016-11-03 21:08:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Get an attorney in California, fast, and follow their advice. Too much at stake to take legal advice from friends, word of mouth and strangers on the internet.

2007-02-16 09:12:47 · answer #3 · answered by Amy B 2 · 0 0

move to a state that wil not allow this

2007-02-16 09:15:45 · answer #4 · answered by King Midas 6 · 0 0

tell arnold to get with it.

2007-02-16 09:12:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

******* mother ******* child rapists...

2007-02-16 09:11:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers