If the jury did'nt have two ex jailbirds and a man who was a pro football player in it do you think it would have been different?
2007-02-16 08:15:56 · 6 answers · asked by pickwicktoptest 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I was actually sickened to watch it, I hope any victim of rape did not watch as it would personally put me off going to the police and taking it to court when there is a chance you could get people on the jury such as Megaman and Stan Collymore. I felt both of them had their minds made up before walking into that court room to hear the evidence. I felt it portrayed a poor picture of our legal and justice system.
2007-02-16 10:11:41 · answer #1 · answered by Suze B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No idea what you are talking about but how do ex-jailbirds ever find their way to being on a jury? That is ridiculous. There's a reason a jury is "selected"....obviously the judges or whomever aren't too bright either.
2007-02-16 16:39:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely I was thinking the same thing. They should have just had normal everyday people on the jury like the last one. It was just another excuse for celebrity had beens to get on the telly again.
2007-02-16 16:27:46 · answer #3 · answered by Buffy 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i thought it was a farce, do u think they were guilty i did and arrogant silly of the pal to sell the tape tho i think that damaged the case a lot
2007-02-16 16:55:43 · answer #4 · answered by jacques 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was all a bit dissapointing in the end. a bit of an anti-climax after watching it for 4 days, don't you think?
2007-02-16 16:24:29 · answer #5 · answered by milopoo2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He played the race card, it always gets people running for cover even if there is no basis for it.
2007-02-16 16:19:54 · answer #6 · answered by tucksie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋