Do you think that violent video games cause kids under the age of 17 to be more...aggressive?
2007-02-16 07:42:22 · 5 answers · asked by princessty 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Besides less then 1%, no. Wouldn't acting out violence in video games help to keep their aggressive down? It can backfire, but that's rare. I'm not sure, but isn't there suppose to be a study somewhere that showed violent crimes deceased after games like Doom came along? Who knows, could have been other factors at work too.
What's so magically about age 17? It's not like reaching that age would suddenly make someone mature. If they were mature or immature before, like at age 16, then it might stay that way for quite awhile longer.
2007-02-16 07:53:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Parents need to start taking responsibility for their kids and stop blaming the rest of the world for their retarded crazy kids.
And stop staying that they have ADD and feeding them drugs.
Our parents and grandparents saw more gore and war then we have and they are not all violent criminals.
2007-02-16 15:53:03 · answer #2 · answered by rickybobbi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do and I would also include those over 17
2007-02-16 15:46:45 · answer #3 · answered by Murray H 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, the child is usually from a lunatic family in the first place.
2007-02-16 16:36:51 · answer #4 · answered by Countess 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. irresponsible parents should stop blaming video games for the way their psycho kid acts.
2007-02-16 15:50:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋