Physicists postulate the existence of particles called tachyons, which have the same problem slowing down from light speed as normal particles have in speeding up to it.
Consider this: "outside the normal space-time continuum" could be considered any activity not bound by the physics of this universe. Isn't a thought exactly that? I mean, anyone can imagine being somewhere a billion miles away, instantaneously. Why doesn't that count as superluminal speed?
2007-02-16 09:40:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by David A 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
We can only perceive objects if they are within the space-time continuum we are familiar with (meaning our universe).
If an object resides outside our universe we can't detect it, so we have no way of confirming or refuting whether it is bound by the physical laws within our universe or not.
2007-02-16 16:29:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, find us an object that resides outside of the normal space time continuum, and then it can be studied.
Your question is tautological: you basically are asking if an object that is allowed to exist outside of the laws of nature is allowed to violate those laws of nature.
2007-02-16 07:41:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Vincent G 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are "element" that could trip a the fee of light: mild and gravity you're staggering, mild won't be in a position to be interpreted as some thing that has no mass. yet what's it then. Einstein regularly occurring equation "E=mc^2" let us know that capability and mass are appropriate, categories of a similar element. Mass is, in accordance to Einstein is an relatively large concentration of capability which would be switched over to a extra "direct" form of capability. once you trip to speeds close to the fee of light, your mass starts off starting to be mild, the main direct form of capability (back, in accordance to Einstein), and once you eventually trip on the fee of light, all your mass turns into mild and there is not any coming back, mild won't be able to cut back speed. simply by fact of this mild speed is the "common" speed shrink, simply by fact mild is the main direct source of capability and travels at that speed!!!!! :O
2016-10-02 06:19:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think speed of light iis only reserved for light because of what it is made of, not it's mass. It's components, probably. And if it was out of the bound which allows things to move, then nothing can move, so probably not. But we haven't solved or discovered everything.
2007-02-16 07:41:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by t_nguyen62791 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perhaps the mass on the outside would deform the mass on the inside. Like a palm squishing an egg.
2007-02-16 07:45:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by thmtom 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think speed exists outside the normal spacetime continuum. So no.
2007-02-16 07:39:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by 006 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably no because speed does not exist outside the space time continium; at least that's what I think.
2007-02-16 07:49:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by ARNAV DUDE 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like in another universe? We have no power to know that.
2007-02-16 09:31:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by anonymous 4
·
0⤊
0⤋