2007-02-16 07:08:47 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Tennis
First off, David Nalbadian shouldn't even be compared to the first 2.
Second, Andre Agassi (thats the spelling) is retired and will be regarded as one of the best of his generation. Note : HIS generation, meaning it's fair to compare him to Sampras, Becker, and other people he competed against during his prime.
Roger Federer is currently regarded as the best player ever by experts and others. But he is in his prime and by his record history, noone has won as much as him in the past 4 years.
2007-02-16 07:15:05 · answer #1 · answered by GuyNextDoor 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Roger Federer
2007-02-18 11:34:15 · answer #2 · answered by biljanarhcp 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Roger Federer
2007-02-16 16:53:25 · answer #3 · answered by 2good4me22 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pete Sampras and Roger Federer are the best. In a few years it will just be Federer.
And David Nalbandian is nowhere near good.
2007-02-16 23:05:42 · answer #4 · answered by trombass08 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think you meant to put pete sampras next to federer and agassi. just the fact that you listed nalbandian as one of the best EVER is too funny. anyway, if sampras was in this list there's no doubt he rules over the other two. but since he's not, i'll go with big fed. even agassi will tell you that. federer, agassi, and sampras are three of the greatest tennis players and they will leave lasting legacies in not only the sport of tennis but in the entire sports world.
2007-02-16 22:15:23 · answer #5 · answered by thizzin' 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To me its Pete Sampras during the 90's. In this century, I would say Roger Federer all the way. He has been improving throughout his career. Now this is his year to win the French Open, since he has gotten farther up in the rounds. He has gotten as far as runners up.
2007-02-16 18:25:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
did u put nalabandian up there...i thought i was misreadin that...and no one has been as dominant as Fed but he doesnt have any competition/....i mean look..theres Nadal on clay..ever since Sampras retired theres been no one in his way...and i think Agassi is probably top 5 all time but he cant be said to be competition for Fed due to his age and physical condition...Sampras who i will say is the greatest ever...the first grand slam he won he beat IVAN LENDL then JOHN MCENROE then ANDRE AGASSI....Fed hasnt played that many greats in a year let alone three straight matches...Fed might beat everyone but wehres the comeptition..the next slam he won he beat BECKER and AGASSI and JIM COURIER...then there was also CHANG, MARTIN, and IVANIESEVIC...and in his last tourney which he won...he made a fool of RODDICK...one of todays top players (which is just pathetic)...thats y i feel sampras is better then Fed...and y i feel Sampras is the best ever
2007-02-18 00:07:05 · answer #7 · answered by shvee21 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ROGER FEDERER is a genius. He could break any existing tennis record at the rate he's going. He's only 25. He's got at least 5 more years ahead of him. And when he retires, he could be the best tennis player of all time. :D
2007-02-18 00:06:28 · answer #8 · answered by eissy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Out of the three, AGASSI. because, he could master over both the kinds of courts. GRASS and CLAY. whereas, as of now, FEDERER has not yet won on clay. let him prove himself on clay. and then we can say that, he is the greatest. he still has a long way to go. let's wait and see. greatness is not winning in one kind of match everytime. he should be able to command on all forms of tennis. that's great. and please remove that DAVID from that list. there are better players, you could have compared.
2007-02-19 07:40:31 · answer #9 · answered by ashwin p 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Federer. I would say Sampras and Laver would make a better argument then Agassi and Nalbanian.
2007-02-16 21:52:42 · answer #10 · answered by messtograves 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋