Did Howard K. Stern do it?

Yes he did. I believe he was jealous that Anna loved her son more than him and so he offed Danny. Then he found out Dannielynne wasn't his an offed Anna. I fear for that baby.

2007-02-16 07:13:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋

I don't know if he is the father, but I think he is what is best for that child. That child has gone through enough and I think Stern would be a good stable person in her life that will help with what life has given her in her young age.

He knew Anna and her son the best and so he can tell Dannylyn what her parent and brother was like and I think that is the only think that matters with this case.

2007-02-16 07:10:16 · answer #2 · answered by bookworm87 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋

The Count ( ZSa ZSa's husband) did not come forward till after Anna was dead. Neither did the bodygaurd. I think both those claims are publicity seekers and have no foundation. I think HOWARD ACTUALLY LOVED ANNA AND THEREFORE, I DO NOT BELIEVE HE HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH EITHER HERS OR DANIEL'S DEATH. This is just such a mess, I do not believe a bigger mess could have been made if someone had deliberately set out to mess up their life.

2007-02-16 09:47:38 · answer #3 · answered by p h 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋

No, not at all. That is why Howard K. Stern put the "K" in the middle of his name.

2016-05-24 07:23:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋

Of course he was in close proximity to her and her son when they died he was stuck up her ***!! I don't think that he did it. I think that way too many people saw who doing things to herself that they knew could harm herself but who is going to stand up to someone who is paying your bills. They all were not going to do anything because they would be too scared they would be fired. Instead of watching out for her and her safety they did what they were told and did what she wanted. Money makes people do stupid things and I think this is just another example of it.

2007-02-16 07:54:53 · answer #5 · answered by Mrs. Know It All 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋

I'm not judge, jury nor executionr, but he had motive (he's the executor of her estate), means (the methodone was still in the house!) and opportunity (he was with both of them right before they died). Circumstanstial evidence, yes; coincidences, maybe.

2007-02-16 07:56:50 · answer #6 · answered by beattyb 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋

Only Anna Nicole and Maury Povich know for sure....

2007-02-16 07:07:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋

He just might have. I'm not saying he killed her, but he has been in close proximity to two young people who died within just a few months of each other. He is very suspicious, in my opinion.

2007-02-16 07:04:08 · answer #8 · answered by Tony M 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋

I think it is too much of a coincidence that he was around when both Anna and Daniel died, he is somehow responsible.....

2007-02-16 07:23:00 · answer #9 · answered by lena 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋

I'm thinking he did
i already asked that question because i think he was responsible for both Daniel and Anna Nicole's deaths.

2007-02-16 07:05:04 · answer #10 · answered by Joannie W 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋

Did Howard K. Stern do it?

23 answers