all right. heres how my unorthodox questions work. they do not give my stance or anything, however, i'm gonig to provide 3 valid points for each side (con. and liberal) and whichever side you choose to side with refute the opposite points. I. E. if i said 1. i like watermelon because... then you would say no, you do not like watermelon because...
PLEASE do not say "i agree with these points!" unless you are also refuting the opposite side's points. thank you!
Pro:
1. In the case of getting no outside help, what are they going to do?
2. What's wrong with vengeance? isn't an eye for an eye correct?
3. Jail = parole / bail / plea bargains, unless it's a life sentence.
Con:
1. That sort of violence is never justified
2. encourages murderers to get away with what they're doing
3. are we truly civilized, to justify the killing of people?
2007-02-16
06:36:28
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Neferiel
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
To clarify something on the pro side: Number 1: You MUST assume that there is no chance of outside help. i know, i know, seems unfair, but life's unfair. ;)
2007-02-16
07:04:04 ·
update #1
omg lori! i'm so sorry! i feel so bad for you :( i hate people who would do something like that...while nursing an infant son... i hope he got life in jail at the LEAST! but, as a wise man once said, if there was no injustice in the world, there would be no need for the law. And thank you for sticking to the format. you gave a very good answer. :)
2007-02-16
07:17:56 ·
update #2