2007-02-16 05:32:27 · 13 answers · asked by mario 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Or as many as you can. From the most liberal to the less liberal!!!
2007-02-16 05:37:09 · update #1
Sometimes war is necessary to keep peace and freedom!!!
2007-02-16 05:40:30 · update #2
Nobody wants war!!!
2007-02-16 05:41:35 · update #3
Everybody wants peace, but how do you protect peace and freedom?
2007-02-16 05:42:30 · update #4
Gore
Clinton
Obama
Sheehan
Kennedy
Boxer
Finstin
Pretty much any Democrat plus a few trade-coat closet Republicans
2007-02-16 06:02:14 · answer #1 · answered by Boomrat 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
John Jack@ss Murtha (Dummocrat - Pennsylvania)
Nancy Bela-Lugosi Pelosi (Dummocrat - California)
John "Swift Boat Traitor" Kerry (Dummocrat - Massachusetts)
Dick H.E.A.D. "Turban" Durbin (Dummocrat - Illinois)
Dennis "16 tons" Kucinich (Dummocrat - Ohio)
Maxine "Doped up Hippy" Waters (Dummocrat - California)
Dianne "Casino Scandal" Feinstein (Dummocrat - California)
Harry "Hairypalms" Reid (Dummocrat - Nevada)
Charlie "The Draft" Rangel (Dummocrat - New York)
Robert "KKK" Byrd (Dummocrat - West Virginia)
for those who answered "Al Gore" sorry, he is not in Congress now and hasn't been a member of Congress since 1993. Also, Al Gore did not object when Clinton helped the Albanian muslim terrorists by killing thousands of Serbians, thus not making him "anti-war".
Also, Cindy Sheehan is not, has not been, nor ever will be a member of Congress.
Obama is definitely a terrible liberal, but being "anti-war" is not what he is particularly known for. In fact what he is being particularly known for is having no experience, no opinions, and riding on the coattails of his senior Senator- Richardhead Durbin. While he IS a complete TOOL, he's not one of the "10 worst anti-war liberals in Congress"
2007-02-16 15:15:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
West Michigan Republican Pete Hoekstra and fellow Republican Representative John Shadegg of Arizona, — Rep. Ron Paul, the iconoclastic, nine-term lawmaker from southeast Texas,
2007-02-16 14:57:56 · answer #3 · answered by junemary 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would answer this but my top choice is John Mutha, and would hate to insult someone with his condition.
It is my belief that the poor man is mentally scared from his experiences. His will and convictions have been broken, and he has been reduced to a coward.
He has done a lot for our country, and I respect him for it. Yet the liberals are exploiting the poor man.
While I am glad he is gainfully employed by the government, I would prefer if he had a position that did not exploit his condition.
Freedom, for anyone is worth fighting for. If we let some people suffer because we do not want to risk loss to help them, then we will end up having to defend ourselves.
Show me a pacifist and I will hit them until they defend them-self or give me all their stuff.
2007-02-16 14:19:03 · answer #4 · answered by heThatDoesNotWantToBeNamed 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I can't vouch for whether they're in congress, but Jesus and his 12 apostles believed in peace not war, love not hate, understanding not slander, and turning the other cheek not torture. It's in this book called the bible. You ought to pick it up and read it some day.
Have a wonderful day.
2007-02-19 14:36:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I notice that the mooncalves are out. These 0 negative bleeding heart left wing fascist nuts seem to think that if you are "anti war", that you are civilized as opposed to ones that are "for war". They want to know what is wrong with that point of view. Simply put, would they fight for ANYTHING or would they allow their way of life and their relatives and friends be taken away so they can demonstrate how stead-fast they are on their convictions that war is wrong? These morons in congress have SWORN TO UPHOLD OUR NATIONS LAWS AND TO PROTECT OUR NATION FROM ALL ENEMIES, BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC yet they blatantly deny that these Islamic terrorists are OUR ENEMIES. I say they should be voted out.
2007-02-16 14:26:14 · answer #6 · answered by just the facts 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
John Kerry
Cindy Sheehan
Al Gore (The Environment Extraordinaire)
Barack Obama
Tim Holden
2007-02-16 13:49:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
If being against war and killing is wrong, I don't want to be right.
Yes, sometimes war is necessary, if it's justified. This war was not justified. First we are going to war because of evidence due to 9/11 attacks connection...that didn't work. Then it was we need war because they harbor terrorists...no evidence again. Then it was about WMDs...no evidence. Then it was Iraqi freedom. I mean, he couldn't even keep his lies straight or switched it around to ensure we would support him. I didn't fall for it the first time. Afagahnastan was a justifiable war...that was forgotten.
2007-02-16 13:37:38 · answer #8 · answered by Groovy 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Almost every Democrat except Lieberman. He is the only Dem. I would vote for. Ever.
2007-02-16 14:32:52 · answer #9 · answered by Chopper 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
May I ask why you are not in the military if you are so PRO war? And we have no business being in Iraq-Afghanistan was just, Iraq is a squandering of young lives, a wasting of massive amounts of funding, and an occupation of a formerly sovereign nation.
2007-02-16 14:23:52 · answer #10 · answered by melouofs 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋